HU-2: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{inscription | {{inscription | ||
|reading= | |reading=§ | ||
|reading_original={{c| | |reading_original=§ | ||
|reading_variant={{c|A|A3}}{{c|U|U2}}<br>ua<br>{{c|Θ}}{{c|I}}{{c|U|U2}}<br>uiΘ | |||
|direction= | |direction=unknown | ||
|letter_height_min=1.1 cm | |letter_height_min=1.1 cm | ||
|letter_height_max=1.2 cm | |letter_height_max=1.2 cm | ||
|word_number=0 | |||
|word_number= | |||
|line_number=1 | |line_number=1 | ||
|script= | |script=unknown | ||
|language= | |language=unknown | ||
|object=HU-2 pot sherd | |object=HU-2 pot sherd | ||
|position=foot, inside | |position=foot, inside | ||
|craftsmanship=engraved | |craftsmanship=engraved | ||
|condition=complete | |condition=complete, restored | ||
|sigla_ir=69 | |sigla_ir=69 | ||
|sigla_mancini=INC-1 | |sigla_mancini=INC-1 | ||
|source=Schumacher 1992: 197; Mancini 2010: 176 | |source=Schumacher 1992: 197; Mancini 2010: 176 | ||
|checklevel=1 | |checklevel=1 | ||
|problem=Kommentar | |problem=unvollst. Kommentar | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | |||
'''First published in {{bib|IR}}'''.<br>The black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely (see drawing). Probably non-script. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 11:52, 21 November 2013
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | § |
| Original script: | § |
| Variant Reading: |   ua   uiΘ |
|
| |
| Object: | HU-2 pot sherd () |
| Position: | foot, inside |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | unknown |
| Letter height: | 1.1 cm – 1.2 cm |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | engraved |
| Current condition: | complete, restored |
| Date of inscription: | |
| Date derived from: | |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | IR 69 LIR INC-1 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 1992: 197 Mancini 2010: 176 |
Commentary
First published in IR.
The black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely (see drawing). Probably non-script.
