SZ-21: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{inscription | {{inscription | ||
|reading= | |reading=? | ||
|reading_original= | |reading_original=? | ||
|direction= | |direction=unknown | ||
|word_number=0 | |word_number=0 | ||
|line_number= | |line_number=0 | ||
|script=unknown | |script=unknown | ||
|language=unknown | |language=unknown | ||
|meaning=unknown | |meaning=unknown | ||
|object=SZ-20 | |object=SZ-20 bronze | ||
|position=upper area | |position=front, upper area | ||
|craftsmanship= | |craftsmanship=embossed | ||
|condition= | |condition=complete, restored | ||
|sigla_pid=202 | |sigla_pid=202 | ||
|sigla_mancini=SA-16 | |sigla_mancini=SA-16 | ||
|sigla_mlr=239 | |||
|sigla_tm=218391 | |||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 137 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 137 | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=2 | ||
|problem= | |problem=Zeichenhöhe, noch was über die tessera-Theorie? oder zu weit hergeholt? | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in {{bib|PID}}. | First published in {{bib|PID}}. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | ||
Along the edge on the animal's back, | |||
Due to a misunderstanding by Whatmough, inscriptions [[index::SZ-20]] and SZ-21 were thought to be inscribed on two different, though similar, objects. | Image in {{bib|LIR}} (drawing). | ||
Along the edge on the animal's back, over a length about 4 cm, a succession of short strokes and angles: {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, from {{bib|PID|Conway}}'s drawing, read {{c||punctuation7}}{{c||I}}{{c||punctuation7}}{{c||V}}{{c||A|d}}{{c||I}}{{c||P2}}{{c||I}}{{c||P2}}{{c||P2}}{{c||I}}{{c||N}}{{c||P2}} {{w||pnippipiav.i.}}. {{bib|LIR|Mancini}}, despite conceding that the inscription is "in realtà inutilizzabile", suggests possible readings {{w||il.nuapiśav.i.}} or {{w||la.nuep.mav.i.}}. Despite the appropriately word-final occurrence of Venetic {{c||H4}}, the stokes are more likely to be decorative, possibly indicating a mane (see [[index::SZ-20]] on the question of which animal we are looking at). Cp., however, [[index::SZ-13]], also on an object atypical among the Sanzeno bronzes, with a very similar row of strokes along the edge, which cannot be interpreted as a mane or the like. | |||
Due to a misunderstanding by {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, inscriptions [[index::SZ-20]] and SZ-21 were thought to be inscribed on two different, though similar, objects. | |||
Further references: {{bib|NRIE}} 98, {{bib|Battisti 1944}}: 230. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:40, 8 November 2021
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | ? |
| Original script: | ? |
|
| |
| Object: | SZ-20 bronze (bronze) (Inscriptions: SZ-20, SZ-21) |
| Position: | front, upper area"upper area" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property. |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | unknown |
| Craftsmanship: | embossed |
| Current condition: | complete, restored |
| Date of inscription: | 5th–1st centuries BC [from object] |
| Date derived from: | cultural context [from object] |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | PID 202 LIR SA-16 MLR 239 TM 218391 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 137 |
Commentary
First published in PID. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Image in LIR (drawing).
Along the edge on the animal's back, over a length about 4 cm, a succession of short strokes and angles: Whatmough, from Conway's drawing, read 
pnippipiav.i.. Mancini, despite conceding that the inscription is "in realtà inutilizzabile", suggests possible readings il.nuapiśav.i. or la.nuep.mav.i.. Despite the appropriately word-final occurrence of Venetic 
, the stokes are more likely to be decorative, possibly indicating a mane (see SZ-20 on the question of which animal we are looking at). Cp., however, SZ-13, also on an object atypical among the Sanzeno bronzes, with a very similar row of strokes along the edge, which cannot be interpreted as a mane or the like.
Due to a misunderstanding by Whatmough, inscriptions SZ-20 and SZ-21 were thought to be inscribed on two different, though similar, objects.
Further references: NRIE 98, Battisti 1944: 230.
Bibliography
| Battisti 1944 | Carlo Battisti, "Osservazioni sulla lingua delle iscrizioni nell'alfabeto etrusco settentrionale di Bolzano", Studi Etruschi 18 (1944), 199–236. |
|---|---|
| LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
