BZ-24: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{inscription | {{inscription | ||
|reading=ossurie!osṣuṛie | |reading=ossurie!osṣuṛie | ||
|reading_original={{c||addE1}}{{c|I}}{{c||addR3}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|| | |reading_original={{c||addE1}}{{c|I}}{{c||addR3}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c||addS1d}}{{c||addS1d}}{{c||addO3}} | ||
|reading_variant=osṣup̣ie<br>{{c||addE1}}{{c||I}}{{c||addR2}}{{c||U2}}{{c|| | |reading_variant=osṣup̣ie<br>{{c||addE1}}{{c||I}}{{c||addR2}}{{c||U2}}{{c||addS1d}}{{c||addS1d}}{{c||addO3}} | ||
|direction=sinistroverse | |direction=sinistroverse | ||
|letter_height_min=4 | |letter_height_min=4 | ||
|letter_height_max=5.4 cm | |letter_height_max=5.4 cm | ||
|letter_number_min=7 | |letter_number_min=7 | ||
|line_number=1 | |line_number=1 | ||
|script=Latin script | |script=Latin script | ||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
|meaning='Ossurie' (PN) | |meaning='Ossurie' (PN) | ||
|object=BZ-24 slab | |object=BZ-24 slab | ||
|position=front | |position=front | ||
|orientation=0 | |orientation=0 | ||
|craftsmanship=engraved | |craftsmanship=engraved | ||
|condition=complete, damaged | |condition=complete, damaged | ||
|sigla_tm=653541 | |||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 324 ff. | |source=Schumacher 2004: 324 ff. | ||
|checklevel=4 | |checklevel=4 | ||
|problem=Zeichengrafiken, Namen, Grabsteininterpretation (etruskisch, römisch?), Verweis Lunz, nochmal Foto von Stefan mit denen von Gugsi vergleichen! | |problem=Zeichengrafiken, Namen, Grabsteininterpretation (etruskisch, römisch?), Verweis Lunz, nochmal Foto von Stefan mit denen von Gugsi vergleichen! | ||
|word_number=1 | |||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
First published in {{bib|Buonamici 1932b}}: 480 f. | First published in {{bib|Buonamici 1932b}}: 480 f. | ||
Pictures in {{bib|Mayr | Pictures in {{bib|Mayr 1956}}: 175 (drawing) and {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 14 (photo). | ||
Listed as BZ-I in {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}}'s corpus. | Listed as BZ-I in {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}}'s corpus. | ||
Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
Length 24 cm. Engraved on the upper part of the stela, inside a house-shaped frame together with a wave-like pattern. | Length 24 cm. Engraved on the upper part of the stela, inside a house-shaped frame together with a wave-like pattern. | ||
The letters are not all equally well legible, some having suffered more by erosion than others. The circle of {{c||addO3}} is clear despite a disturbance in the upper right area, next to which a piece of the stone has broken off. The next letter, a rounded {{c|| | The letters are not all equally well legible, some having suffered more by erosion than others. The circle of {{c||addO3}} is clear despite a disturbance in the upper right area, next to which a piece of the stone has broken off. The next letter, a rounded {{c||addS1d}} distinctly longer than {{c||addO3}}, is equally unambiguous. To the left of this, an oblique line running parallel to the middle part of {{c||addS1d}} is clearly visible, suggesting another {{c||addS1d}}. No other reading seems feasible, although the area under the central line is disturbed, and no trace of a line can be made out in the area above it. (The upper part of the preceding {{c||addS1d}} is less deeply scratched than the lower curve; if the same was the case with the second {{c||addS1d}}, the upper part might indeed be completely gone.) The angle of {{c||U2}}, the same height as {{c||addO3}} again, is clear. The letter after {{c||U2}} is problematic: The hasta of a shape like a Raetic {{c||R2}}, the same height as {{c||U2}}, is prolonged in the bottom (though heavily eroded in that part) to the height of {{c||addS1d}}, prompting {{bib|Mayr 1956}}: 175 to read Latin {{c||addR2}} {{p||p}}. The area where the downstroke of a Latin {{c||addR3}} would be is disturbed; what is visible there looks more like a dot which may or may not be intentional. An interpretation of {{c||addR2}} as Etruscoid {{p||r}} is unlikely due to the presence of {{c||addO3}}. The inscription concludes with unambiguous {{c||I}} and {{c||E}}, both as high as {{c||addS1d}}. | ||
The inscription is classified as being written in the Latin script due to most letters displaying decidedly Latin features: Apart from the presence of {{c||addO3}}, {{c|| | The inscription is classified as being written in the Latin script due to most letters displaying decidedly Latin features: Apart from the presence of {{c||addO3}}, {{c||addS1d}} is rounded and written twice, and {{c||addE1}} features straight bars. {{c||I}} appears to be written with serifs (cp. [[index::RN-1]]). The epigraphically Raetic features of the inscription are the sinistroverse writing and {{c||addS1d}} with the upper angle/curve opening against writing direction. | ||
Linguistically, the inscription can be interpreted as a Raetic individual name typically ending in -{{p||i}}{{p||e}}. {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}} prefers a reading {{w||ossurie}} based on the observation that two names ending in -{{p||u}}{{p||r}}{{p||i}}{{p||e}} ({{w|| | Linguistically, the inscription can be interpreted as a Raetic individual name typically ending in -{{p||i}}{{p||e}}. {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}} prefers a reading {{w||ossurie}} based on the observation that two names ending in -{{p||u}}{{p||r}}{{p||i}}{{p||e}} (really only one: {{w||φelturiesi|φelturie}}), but none ending in -{{p||u}}{{p||p}}{{p||i}}{{p||e}}, are documented in the Raetic corpus. The interpretation of the sequence as a name is of course supported by the fact that the stela is identified as a tombstone by '''???''' – the only proper inscribed grave stela known from the Raetic area. It appears to document the transition between Raetic and Roman culture in the Bozen area, with a person bearing a Raetic name having a tombstone of Southern type erected in their honour. The question remains, why the individual name stands alone without a patronym so frequently attested on movable objects, although the name systems of both Etruscans and Romans were also multipart. | ||
Further references: | Further references: '''Lunz 1990: 38 f.''' | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Latest revision as of 20:56, 8 November 2021
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | osṣuṛie |
Original script: | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Variant Reading: | osṣup̣ie![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| |
Object: | BZ-24 slab (sandstone) |
Position: | front |
Orientation: | 0° |
Script: | Latin script |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Letter height: | 44 cm <br /> – 5.4 cm |
Number of letters: | 7 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | complete, damaged |
Archaeological culture: | Roman republican period [from object] |
Date of inscription: | |
Date derived from: | |
| |
Language: | Raetic |
Meaning: | 'Ossurie' (PN) |
| |
Alternative sigla: | TM 653541 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 324 ff. |
Images
Object BZ-24 slab with inscription BZ-24.
|
Inscription BZ-24.
|
Commentary
First published in Buonamici 1932b: 480 f.
Pictures in Mayr 1956: 175 (drawing) and Schumacher 2004: Taf. 14 (photo).
Listed as BZ-I in Schumacher's corpus.
Length 24 cm. Engraved on the upper part of the stela, inside a house-shaped frame together with a wave-like pattern.
The letters are not all equally well legible, some having suffered more by erosion than others. The circle of is clear despite a disturbance in the upper right area, next to which a piece of the stone has broken off. The next letter, a rounded
distinctly longer than
, is equally unambiguous. To the left of this, an oblique line running parallel to the middle part of
is clearly visible, suggesting another
. No other reading seems feasible, although the area under the central line is disturbed, and no trace of a line can be made out in the area above it. (The upper part of the preceding
is less deeply scratched than the lower curve; if the same was the case with the second
, the upper part might indeed be completely gone.) The angle of
, the same height as
again, is clear. The letter after
is problematic: The hasta of a shape like a Raetic
, the same height as
, is prolonged in the bottom (though heavily eroded in that part) to the height of
, prompting Mayr 1956: 175 to read Latin
p. The area where the downstroke of a Latin
would be is disturbed; what is visible there looks more like a dot which may or may not be intentional. An interpretation of
as Etruscoid r is unlikely due to the presence of
. The inscription concludes with unambiguous
and
, both as high as
.
The inscription is classified as being written in the Latin script due to most letters displaying decidedly Latin features: Apart from the presence of ,
is rounded and written twice, and
features straight bars.
appears to be written with serifs (cp. RN-1). The epigraphically Raetic features of the inscription are the sinistroverse writing and
with the upper angle/curve opening against writing direction.
Linguistically, the inscription can be interpreted as a Raetic individual name typically ending in -ie. Schumacher prefers a reading ossurie based on the observation that two names ending in -urie (really only one: φelturie), but none ending in -upie, are documented in the Raetic corpus. The interpretation of the sequence as a name is of course supported by the fact that the stela is identified as a tombstone by ??? – the only proper inscribed grave stela known from the Raetic area. It appears to document the transition between Raetic and Roman culture in the Bozen area, with a person bearing a Raetic name having a tombstone of Southern type erected in their honour. The question remains, why the individual name stands alone without a patronym so frequently attested on movable objects, although the name systems of both Etruscans and Romans were also multipart.
Further references: Lunz 1990: 38 f.
Bibliography
Buonamici 1932b | Giulio Buonamici, "Rivista di epigrafia etrusca 1931–1932", Studi Etruschi 6 (1932), 459–496. |
---|---|
Mayr 1956 | Karl M. Mayr, "Räto-römischer Grabstein mit Inschrift aus Maderneid in Eppan", Der Schlern 30 (1956), 175–176. |