BZ-23: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|sigla_mancini=INC-1 | |sigla_mancini=INC-1 | ||
|sigla_mlr=301 | |sigla_mlr=301 | ||
|sigla_tm=653540 | |||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 197 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 197 | ||
|checklevel=0 | |checklevel=0 | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
First published in {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}}: 442. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | First published in {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}}: 442. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | ||
Images in {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}}: 442, fig. 1 (drawing), {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}), {{bib|MLR}} (photo). | |||
Listed as HU-2 in {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}}'s corpus | Listed as HU-2 in {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}}'s corpus – the inscription was republished by {{bib|IR|Mancini}} as one of unknown provenance. | ||
The scratches can be arranged to read {{c||A7}}{{c||U2}} {{w||ua}} or {{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||U2}} {{w||uiθ}} – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | The scratches can be arranged to read {{c||A7}}{{c||U2}} {{w||ua}} or {{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||U2}} {{w||uiθ}} – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:56, 8 November 2021
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | ?(?)u |
| Original script: |   or  
|
|
| |
| Object: | BZ-23 potsherd (pottery) |
| Position: | foot, inside |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
| Letter height: | 1.11.1 cm <br /> – 1.2 cm |
| Number of characters: | 2 – 3 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | incised |
| Current condition: | complete, restored |
| Archaeological culture: | Hallstatt D, La Tène A, La Tène B [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | end of the 6th–middle of the 3rd centuries BC [from object] |
| Date derived from: | archaeological context [from object] |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | IR 69 LIR INC-1 MLR 301 TM 653540 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 197 |
Commentary
First published in Torggler-Wöß 1953b: 442. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Images in Torggler-Wöß 1953b: 442, fig. 1 (drawing), IR (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = LIR), MLR (photo).
Listed as HU-2 in Schumacher's corpus – the inscription was republished by Mancini as one of unknown provenance.
The scratches can be arranged to read ua or uiθ – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
Bibliography
| IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
|---|---|
| LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
