NO-17 bone point: Difference between revisions
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|inventory_number=R.R. 3066 | |inventory_number=R.R. 3066 | ||
|source=Marchesini 2014: 138, fig. 4 | |source=Marchesini 2014: 138, fig. 4 | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=5 | ||
|problem=detailed object description | |||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Bone point.<br>Small bone rod divided into an elongated section with a flat, long-oval and edged cross section and a lanceolate and perforated part. Complete extant.<br>Along an [[index::NO-17|extensive inscription]].<br>The bone point was discovered during official excavations which were executed by the [[index::Soprintendenza per i beni architettonici e archeologici della provincia autonoma di Trento|monument protection service]] between 1999 and 2007.<br>According to the Gamper's explanations related to the discoveries on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill, it can be said that the extension related to bone points includes the areas along the ''Val d'Adige'' (''Etschtal'') to the ''Valpolicella'' region (cp. map 29 in {{bib|Gamper 2006}}: 143). Inscribed bone points appear in the settlements among others of [[index::Sanzeno]] and [[index::Montesei di Serso]]. These settlements date to middle and late [[index::chronological classification|La Tène period]]. However there are other bone points e.g. from [[index::Monte Ozol]] which date already to the late [[index::chronological classification|Hallstatt period]]. But these objects are neither inscribed nor decorated and the dimension of these is larger than of those which date to later periods. The function of these bone points are uncertain. It can be suggested that they were used in handcraft sector or that they were part of the attire. Related to this insecurity Gamper indicates these objects on one side as bone points (''Knochenspitze''), otherwise he uses also the term needle (''Nadel'') (cp. {{bib|Gamper 2006}}: 145). The secondary function of these bone points is the use and deposition of these for the ritual abandonment of houses. The [[index::Archaeology and cultural aspects|ritual context]] can be verified so far only on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill and the here located settlement. Related to altogether four houses resp. rooms the ritual use of the bone points is proved on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill. Gamper suggests that a partly [[index::Archaeology and cultural aspects|ritual function]] of the bone points can be supposed for the late [[index::chronological classification|La Tène period]] (cp. {{bib|Gamper 2006}}: 145). On the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill were discovered several inscribed bone points (cp. in the present data bank [[index::VN-9 bone point]], [[index::VN-11 bone point]],[[index::VN-12 bone point]], [[index::VN-16 bone point]] and [[index::VN-18 bone point]]) as well as a large number of bone points with incised signs of which the interpretation is uncertain. Probably they present decorations, numbers or the like (cp. the main chapter about the [[index::Non-script notational systems]]). Further examples of inscribed bone points derive from other find places (cp. in the present data bank [[index::NO-17 bone point]] and [[index::VR-22 bone point]]). Marchesini indicates [[index::SZ-48 bone]] as fragment of a further bone point (cp. {{bib|Marchesini 2014}}: 138).<br>So far not autopsied by the ''Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum''. The indications follow the information given in literature (cp. below the bibliography) and by comparing with the already autopsied bone points from the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill. | Bone point.<br>Small bone rod divided into an elongated section with a flat, long-oval and edged cross section and a lanceolate and perforated part. Complete extant.<br>Along an [[index::NO-17|extensive inscription]].<br>The bone point was discovered during official excavations which were executed by the [[index::Soprintendenza per i beni architettonici e archeologici della provincia autonoma di Trento|monument protection service]] between 1999 and 2007.<br>According to the Gamper's explanations related to the discoveries on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill, it can be said that the extension related to bone points includes the areas along the ''Val d'Adige'' (''Etschtal'') to the ''Valpolicella'' region (cp. map 29 in {{bib|Gamper 2006}}: 143). Inscribed bone points appear in the settlements among others of [[index::Sanzeno]] and [[index::Montesei di Serso]]. These settlements date to middle and late [[index::chronological classification|La Tène period]]. However there are other bone points e.g. from [[index::Monte Ozol]] which date already to the late [[index::chronological classification|Hallstatt period]]. But these objects are neither inscribed nor decorated and the dimension of these is larger than of those which date to later periods. The function of these bone points are uncertain. It can be suggested that they were used in handcraft sector or that they were part of the attire. Related to this insecurity Gamper indicates these objects on one side as bone points (''Knochenspitze''), otherwise he uses also the term needle (''Nadel'') (cp. {{bib|Gamper 2006}}: 145). The secondary function of these bone points is the use and deposition of these for the ritual abandonment of houses. The [[index::Archaeology and cultural aspects|ritual context]] can be verified so far only on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill and the here located settlement. Related to altogether four houses resp. rooms the ritual use of the bone points is proved on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill. Gamper suggests that a partly [[index::Archaeology and cultural aspects|ritual function]] of the bone points can be supposed for the late [[index::chronological classification|La Tène period]] (cp. {{bib|Gamper 2006}}: 145). On the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill were discovered several inscribed bone points (cp. in the present data bank [[index::VN-9 bone point]], [[index::VN-11 bone point]],[[index::VN-12 bone point]], [[index::VN-16 bone point]] and [[index::VN-18 bone point]]) as well as a large number of bone points with incised signs of which the interpretation is uncertain. Probably they present decorations, numbers or the like (cp. the main chapter about the [[index::Non-script notational systems]]). Further examples of inscribed bone points derive from other find places (cp. in the present data bank [[index::NO-17 bone point]] and [[index::VR-22 bone point]]). Marchesini indicates [[index::SZ-48 bone]] as fragment of a further bone point (cp. {{bib|Marchesini 2014}}: 138).<br>So far not autopsied by the ''Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum''. The indications follow the information given in literature (cp. below the bibliography) and by comparing with the already autopsied bone points from the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill.<br>''S.K.'' | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 13:52, 2 February 2015
| Object | |
|---|---|
| Classification: | bone |
| Archaeological type: | bone point |
| Material: | bone |
| Size: | length 13.9 cm, diameter med. 0.5 cm, length of the top 0.9 cm |
| Condition: | complete |
| Date: | 5th–2nd centuries BC |
| Date derived from: | archaeological context |
|
| |
| Site: | Cles (Trento, Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy) |
| Field name: | Campi Neri |
| Coordinates (approx.): | 46° 22' 1.20" N, 11° 1' 58.80" E [from site] |
| Find date: | between 1999 and 2007 |
| Find circumstances: | excavation |
| Current location: | Museo Retico Sanzeno |
| Inventory Nr.: | R.R. 3066 |
|
| |
| Inscription: | NO-17 (ketanuvaleutiku) |
|
| |
| Sources: | Marchesini 2014: 138, fig. 4 |
Images
 Object NO-17 bone point with inscription NO-17.
|
Commentary
Bone point.
Small bone rod divided into an elongated section with a flat, long-oval and edged cross section and a lanceolate and perforated part. Complete extant.
Along an extensive inscription.
The bone point was discovered during official excavations which were executed by the monument protection service between 1999 and 2007.
According to the Gamper's explanations related to the discoveries on the Ganglegg hill, it can be said that the extension related to bone points includes the areas along the Val d'Adige (Etschtal) to the Valpolicella region (cp. map 29 in Gamper 2006: 143). Inscribed bone points appear in the settlements among others of Sanzeno and Montesei di Serso. These settlements date to middle and late La Tène period. However there are other bone points e.g. from Monte Ozol which date already to the late Hallstatt period. But these objects are neither inscribed nor decorated and the dimension of these is larger than of those which date to later periods. The function of these bone points are uncertain. It can be suggested that they were used in handcraft sector or that they were part of the attire. Related to this insecurity Gamper indicates these objects on one side as bone points (Knochenspitze), otherwise he uses also the term needle (Nadel) (cp. Gamper 2006: 145). The secondary function of these bone points is the use and deposition of these for the ritual abandonment of houses. The ritual context can be verified so far only on the Ganglegg hill and the here located settlement. Related to altogether four houses resp. rooms the ritual use of the bone points is proved on the Ganglegg hill. Gamper suggests that a partly ritual function of the bone points can be supposed for the late La Tène period (cp. Gamper 2006: 145). On the Ganglegg hill were discovered several inscribed bone points (cp. in the present data bank VN-9 bone point, VN-11 bone point,VN-12 bone point, VN-16 bone point and VN-18 bone point) as well as a large number of bone points with incised signs of which the interpretation is uncertain. Probably they present decorations, numbers or the like (cp. the main chapter about the Non-script notational systems). Further examples of inscribed bone points derive from other find places (cp. in the present data bank NO-17 bone point and VR-22 bone point). Marchesini indicates SZ-48 bone as fragment of a further bone point (cp. Marchesini 2014: 138).
So far not autopsied by the Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum. The indications follow the information given in literature (cp. below the bibliography) and by comparing with the already autopsied bone points from the Ganglegg hill.
S.K.
Bibliography
| Endrizzi 2014 | Lorenza Endrizzi, "Nota sul rinvenimento e inquadramento contestuale", in: Simona Marchesini, "Nuove iscrizioni retiche da Cles e Sanzeno (Trento)", in: Rosa Roncador, Franco Nicolis, Antichi popoli delle Alpi. Sviluppi culturali durante l'età del Ferro nei territori alpini centro-orientali (Atti della giornata internazionale di studi 1 maggio 2010 Sanzeno, Trento), Trento: Provincia autonoma di Trento. Soprintendenza per i beni architettonici e archeologici 2014, 127–144, 128. |
|---|---|
| Gamper 2006 | Peter Gamper, Die latènezeitliche Besiedlung am Ganglegg in Südtirol. Neue Forschungen zur Fritzens-Sanzeno-Kultur [= Internationale Archäologie 91], Rahden/Westfalen: Leidorf 2006. |
| Marchesini 2014 | Simona Marchesini, "Nuove iscrizioni retiche da Cles e Sanzeno (Trento)", in: Rosa Roncador, Franco Nicolis, Antichi popoli delle Alpi. Sviluppi culturali durante l'età del Ferro nei territori alpini centro-orientali (Atti della giornata internazionale di studi 1 maggio 2010 Sanzeno, Trento), Trento: Provincia autonoma di Trento. Soprintendenza per i beni architettonici e archeologici 2014, 127–144. |
