tianus: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
In isolation the most obvious segmentation is pianu{{m||-s}} (benefactive genitive, see context in [[index::NO-15]]), but cp. | In isolation the most obvious segmentation is pianu{{m||-s}} (benefactive genitive, see context in [[index::NO-15]]), but cp. {{w||pianusa}}, apparently with a base ''pianus'' plus {{m||-a|a}}-genitive. In Raetic context, the vocalic auslaut of names makes {{w||pianu}} more likely than ''pianus'', though it may be objectionable to extend this rule from anthroponyms to theonyms. Maybe a case of recutting? | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 02:48, 21 February 2015
| Word | |
|---|---|
| Language: | Raetic |
| Word type: | proper noun |
|
| |
| Number: | singular |
|
| |
| Meaning: | '(of/for?) Pianu*' |
|
| |
| Attestation: | NO-15 (esumnesinuþnualeutikutianus) (1) |
Commentary
In isolation the most obvious segmentation is pianu-s (benefactive genitive, see context in NO-15), but cp. pianusa, apparently with a base pianus plus a-genitive. In Raetic context, the vocalic auslaut of names makes pianu more likely than pianus, though it may be objectionable to extend this rule from anthroponyms to theonyms. Maybe a case of recutting?
