WE-2: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
|craftsmanship=incised before firing
|craftsmanship=incised before firing
|condition=damaged, fragmentary
|condition=damaged, fragmentary
|sigla_mancini=BZ-31
|sigla_mlr=294
|sigla_tm=218572
|source=Schumacher 2004: 189, 214
|source=Schumacher 2004: 189, 214
|checklevel=2
|checklevel=2
Line 19: Line 22:
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
First published in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}: 189.
Pictures in {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 5,2 (drawing) and 6,1 (photo), {{bib|LIR}} (drawing), {{bib|MLR}} (drawing).
Length of the visible remains, including the upper tips of characters on the right, 2.6 cm. The scratches are well visible. {{c||E|d}} is clear; on the breaking edge to its left, the very tip of a bar may be visible (see drawing), but it might be merely an unintentional dent. It is therefore unclear whether there were characters before {{c||E|d}}. {{c||E|d}} is followed by a tip-up chevron, the lower part og which is broken off ({{c||U|d}} or {{c||A}}). Then, in the upper area above the breaking edge, the tip of a scratch inclined to the left, a small angle opening to the right, and the very tip of another scratch. {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}}'s tentative reading {{w||eais}} is unlikely, for the very reasons mentioned by himself: The scratch after the chevron is inclined, and would have had to merge with the hypothetical {{c||S|d}}, for which the angle is too small. The visible tips are too crowded to suggest actual letters; despite {{c||E|d}}, we are probably concerned with non-script. (See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.) Note in this context that the inscription was applied before firing.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 22:16, 8 November 2021

Inscription
Transliteration: ]e[???
Original script: ]E d[???

Object: WE-2 potsherd (pottery)
Position: outside
Script: unknown
Direction of writing: dextroverse
Letter height: 1.8 cm
Number of letters: 2
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: incised before firing
Current condition: damaged, fragmentary
Date of inscription:
Date derived from:

Language: unknown
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: LIR BZ-31
MLR 294
TM 218572
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 189, 214

Images

Commentary

First published in Schumacher 1992: 189.

Pictures in Schumacher 2004: Taf. 5,2 (drawing) and 6,1 (photo), LIR (drawing), MLR (drawing).

Length of the visible remains, including the upper tips of characters on the right, 2.6 cm. The scratches are well visible. E d is clear; on the breaking edge to its left, the very tip of a bar may be visible (see drawing), but it might be merely an unintentional dent. It is therefore unclear whether there were characters before E d. E d is followed by a tip-up chevron, the lower part og which is broken off (U d or A s). Then, in the upper area above the breaking edge, the tip of a scratch inclined to the left, a small angle opening to the right, and the very tip of another scratch. Schumacher's tentative reading eais is unlikely, for the very reasons mentioned by himself: The scratch after the chevron is inclined, and would have had to merge with the hypothetical S d, for which the angle is too small. The visible tips are too crowded to suggest actual letters; despite E d, we are probably concerned with non-script. (See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.) Note in this context that the inscription was applied before firing.

Bibliography

LIR Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes)