AS-3: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{inscription
{{inscription
|reading=§ space iθθi
|reading=? space iθθi
|reading_original={{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}
|reading_original={{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}
|direction=ambiguous
|direction=ambiguous
Line 15: Line 15:
|condition=damaged
|condition=damaged
|type_inscription=prob. mark of manufacturer
|type_inscription=prob. mark of manufacturer
|sigla_pid=218 ii
|sigla_pid=218 (i a)
|sigla_mancini=ROT-3
|sigla_mancini=ROT-3
|sigla_mlr=110 (1)
|sigla_tm=218500
|source=Schumacher 2004: 167
|source=Schumacher 2004: 167
|checklevel=0
|checklevel=0
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
First published in {{bib|Pellegrini 1915}}: 120 f. Autopsied by TIR on 16<sup>th</sup> October 2015.
Image in {{bib|Pellegrini 1915}}: tav. II, 23 (drawing).
Incised on the narrow bottom of the vessel. The characters are well legible, covering the entire breadth of the bottom; the sequence extends over 3.5 cm. To its left (assuming that the marks should be viewed with the vessel upside-down, as is the case with most of the corresponding inscriptions from [[index::Bostel]]), at a distance of about 1 cm, four vertical lines crossed by one oblique line. While this second mark so far has no parallel in Bostel, the sequence {{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}} is also found on [[index::AS-15]], in combination with a language-encoding inscription. Cp. also [[index::AS-2]]. In view of its reoccurrence in the same find place, the group can be interpreted as a manufacturer's mark.
Note that in {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}, the ceramic fragment with inscription AS-3 is said to bear characters in four separate places – a misunderstanding of {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}'s truncated presentation of the testimonies. The other three fragments mentioned by {{bib|Pellegrini 1915|Pellegrini}} (p. 121):<br>
{{bib|PID}} (i) b = {{bib|LIR}} ROT-4 = [[index::Non-script notational systems|EX-101]] {{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}<br>
{{bib|PID}} (i) c = {{bib|LIR}} ROT-13 = [[index::Non-script notational systems|EX-102]] {{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}<br>
{{bib|PID}} (i) d = {{bib|LIR}} ROT-14 = [[index::Non-script notational systems|EX-103]] {{c||Θ}}<br>
are likely to represent partially damaged examples of the same sequence {{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 20:42, 8 November 2021

Inscription
Transliteration: ? iθθi
Original script: I sΘ sΘ sI s

Object: AS-3 potsherd (pottery)
Position: bottom
Script: unknown
Direction of writing: ambiguous
Letter height: 2 cm
Number of characters: 4
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: incised
Current condition: damaged
Date of inscription: end of the 4th-3rd centuries BC [from object]
Date derived from: archaeological context [from object]

Type: prob. mark of manufacturer
Language: unknown
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: PID 218 (i a)
LIR ROT-3
MLR 110 (1)
TM 218500
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 167

Commentary

First published in Pellegrini 1915: 120 f. Autopsied by TIR on 16th October 2015.

Image in Pellegrini 1915: tav. II, 23 (drawing).

Incised on the narrow bottom of the vessel. The characters are well legible, covering the entire breadth of the bottom; the sequence extends over 3.5 cm. To its left (assuming that the marks should be viewed with the vessel upside-down, as is the case with most of the corresponding inscriptions from Bostel), at a distance of about 1 cm, four vertical lines crossed by one oblique line. While this second mark so far has no parallel in Bostel, the sequence I sΘ sΘ sI s is also found on AS-15, in combination with a language-encoding inscription. Cp. also AS-2. In view of its reoccurrence in the same find place, the group can be interpreted as a manufacturer's mark.

Note that in Schumacher 2004, the ceramic fragment with inscription AS-3 is said to bear characters in four separate places – a misunderstanding of Whatmough's truncated presentation of the testimonies. The other three fragments mentioned by Pellegrini (p. 121):
PID (i) b = LIR ROT-4 = EX-101 Θ sΘ sI s
PID (i) c = LIR ROT-13 = EX-102 Θ sΘ s
PID (i) d = LIR ROT-14 = EX-103 Θ s
are likely to represent partially damaged examples of the same sequence I sΘ sΘ sI s.

Bibliography

LIR Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes)