φuter: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Corinna Salomon moved page φuper to φuter without leaving a redirect)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
|type_word=noun
|type_word=noun
|number=plural
|number=plural
|case=nominative/accusative
|gender=animate
|language=Raetic
|language=Raetic
|lemma=φup-
|lemma=φut(e)-
|analysis_morphemic=φup{{m|-er}}
|analysis_morphemic=φute{{m|-r(a)|-r}}{{m|-Ø}}
|meaning=unknown
|meaning=unknown
|checklevel=1
|checklevel=0
|problem=wallace
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
Evidently a noun in the plural, being accompanied by the numeral {{w||þal}}. Archaic auslauting {{p||a}} of the plural ending {{m||-r(a)|-ra}} has, as in Etruscan, been lost through apocope. One of only two grammatically marked plurals in the Raetic corpus so far. The word is lexically obscure, no Etruscan cognate is known, but note that the {{p||r}}-plural marks animate nouns. The absence of a case ending makes the form the only clear case of a nominative/accusative in the corpus so far.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 21:11, 10 February 2017

Word
Language: Raetic
Word type: noun

Case: nominative/accusative
Number: plural
Gender: animate

Morphemic analysis: φute-r
Meaning: unknown

Attestation: SZ-4.1 (kativates/kalitis þal φuter suχ) (1)

Commentary

Evidently a noun in the plural, being accompanied by the numeral þal. Archaic auslauting a of the plural ending -ra has, as in Etruscan, been lost through apocope. One of only two grammatically marked plurals in the Raetic corpus so far. The word is lexically obscure, no Etruscan cognate is known, but note that the r-plural marks animate nouns. The absence of a case ending makes the form the only clear case of a nominative/accusative in the corpus so far.