φuter: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|number=plural | |number=plural | ||
|language=Raetic | |language=Raetic | ||
|lemma=φut- | |lemma=φut(e)- | ||
|analysis_morphemic= | |analysis_morphemic=φute{{m|-r(a)|-r}} | ||
|meaning=unknown | |meaning=unknown | ||
|checklevel=0 | |checklevel=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Evidently a noun in the plural, being accompanied by the numeral {{w||þal}}. | Evidently a noun in the plural, being accompanied by the numeral {{w||þal}}. Archaic auslauting {{p||a}} of the plural ending {{m||-r(a)|-ra}} has, as in Etruscan, been lost through apocope. One of only two grammatically marked plurals in the Raetic corpus so far. The word is lexically obscure; no known Etruscan cognate. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 22:42, 9 February 2017
| Word | |
|---|---|
| Language: | Raetic |
| Word type: | noun |
|
| |
| Number: | plural |
|
| |
| Morphemic analysis: | φute-r |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Attestation: | SZ-4.1 (kativates/kalitis þal φuter suχ) (1) |
Commentary
Evidently a noun in the plural, being accompanied by the numeral þal. Archaic auslauting a of the plural ending -ra has, as in Etruscan, been lost through apocope. One of only two grammatically marked plurals in the Raetic corpus so far. The word is lexically obscure; no known Etruscan cognate.
