BZ-21: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
First published in {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 229 (C. 2). Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | First published in {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 229 (C. 2). Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | ||
Only the upper or lower part of the inscription is left: two strokes, a chevron and probably two more strokes. {{bib|Franz 1959|Franz}} read {{w||iiθi}}, ignoring the leftmost trace, with {{c||Θ}} and {{c||I}} very close to each other - if letters, {{c||A2}} would be a more likely conjecture. Compare, however, [[index::BZ-20]]. See [[index::Non- | Only the upper or lower part of the inscription is left: two strokes, a chevron and probably two more strokes. {{bib|Franz 1959|Franz}} read {{w||iiθi}}, ignoring the leftmost trace, with {{c||Θ}} and {{c||I}} very close to each other - if letters, {{c||A2}} would be a more likely conjecture. Compare, however, [[index::BZ-20]]. See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 16:41, 16 March 2015
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | ịị?(?)ị[ |
| Original script: | ? |
|
| |
| Object: | BZ-21 potsherd (pottery) |
| Position: | bottom, outside |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
| Number of characters: | 3 – 5 |
| Craftsmanship: | incised |
| Current condition: | fragmentary |
| Archaeological culture: | La Tène A [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | middle of the 5th–1st half of the 4th centuries BC [from object] |
| Date derived from: | typology, archaeological context [from object] |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | none |
Commentary
First published in Franz 1959: 229 (C. 2). Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Only the upper or lower part of the inscription is left: two strokes, a chevron and probably two more strokes. Franz read iiθi, ignoring the leftmost trace, with 
and 
very close to each other - if letters, 
would be a more likely conjecture. Compare, however, BZ-20. See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
Bibliography
| Franz 1959 | Leonhard Franz, "Rätische Inschriften im Innsbrucker Landesmuseum", Der Schlern 33 (1959), 228–229. |
|---|
