UG-2.2: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|direction=unknown
|direction=unknown
|letter_height_min=8 cm
|letter_height_min=8 cm
|word_number=0
|line_number=1
|line_number=1
|script=unknown
|script=unknown
Line 10: Line 9:
|meaning=unknown
|meaning=unknown
|object=UG-2 rock
|object=UG-2 rock
|position=centre, right area
|position=bottom, medial
|frame_left=unknown
|frame_left=unknown
|frame_middle=top and bottom
|frame_middle=top and bottom
Line 16: Line 15:
|craftsmanship=engraved
|craftsmanship=engraved
|condition=damaged
|condition=damaged
|culture_archaeological=La Tène
|type_inscription=unknown
|sortdate=-250
|checklevel=0
|date=5th–1st centuries BC
|checklevel=1
|problem=drinlassen?
|disambiguation=UG-2
|disambiguation=UG-2
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
Unpublished. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014.
First published in TIR. Examined by TIR in July 2014.


Picture of the area concerned in {{bib|Mandl 2011}}: Abb. 134 (photo). Photo of the entire rock wall in {{bib|Mandl 2011}}: Abb. 97.
Image in {{bib|Mandl 2011}}: Abb. 134 (photo = {{bib|Schumacher 2016}}: Abb. 4).


The very doubtful remains of an inscription to the immediate right of [[index::UG-2.1]]. The trace of a frame line at the appropriate distance from the lower frame line of [[index::UG-2.1]] can be seen in the upper area (under {{c||U5|d}} through {{c||E|d}} of that inscription). Between these two lines, the faint traces of possibly intentional scratches may be guessed at. If we are indeed concerned with the remains of letters, the inscription must be older than [[index::UG-2.1]] to account for its much inferior condition.
The doubtful remains of an inscription to the immediate right of [[index::UG-2.1]]. The trace of a frame line at the appropriate distance from the lower frame line of [[index::UG-2.1]] can be seen in the upper area (under {{c||U5|d}} through {{c||E|d}} of that inscription). Between these two lines, the faint traces of possibly intentional scratches are visible. No reading can be offered.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 16:57, 14 April 2020

edit with form
Inscription
Transliteration: ?
Original script: ?
Object: UG-2 rock (stone)
(Inscriptions: UG-2.1, UG-2.2)
Position: bottom, medial
Frame: ?Frame middle: top and bottomFrame middle: top and bottom?   (unknown, top and bottom, unknown)
Script: unknown
Direction of writing: unknown
Letter height: 8 cm
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: engraved
Current condition: damaged
Date of inscription:
Date derived from:
Type: unknown
Language: unknown
Meaning: unknown
Alternative sigla: none

Images

UG-2.1, UG-2.2
Inscriptions UG-2.1 and UG-2.2.

Commentary

First published in TIR. Examined by TIR in July 2014.

Image in Mandl 2011: Abb. 134 (photo = Schumacher 2016: Abb. 4).

The doubtful remains of an inscription to the immediate right of UG-2.1. The trace of a frame line at the appropriate distance from the lower frame line of UG-2.1 can be seen in the upper area (under U5 d through E d of that inscription). Between these two lines, the faint traces of possibly intentional scratches are visible. No reading can be offered.

Bibliography

Mandl 2011 Franz Mandl, Felsbilder. Österreich – Bayern: Nördliche Kalkalpen [= Anisa – Verein für alpine Forschung 4], Haus im Ennstal: 2011.
Retrieved from "https://tir.univie.ac.at/index.php?title=UG-2.2&oldid=17555"