VN-15: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|craftsmanship=engraved | |craftsmanship=engraved | ||
|condition=damaged, fragmentary | |condition=damaged, fragmentary | ||
|sigla_tm=653631 | |||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 324 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 324 | ||
|checklevel=1 | |checklevel=1 |
Latest revision as of 21:06, 8 November 2021
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ? / ]χ̣ạ |
Original script: | [ |
| |
Object: | VN-15 bone (bone) |
Position: | front |
Script: | North Italic script |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Letter height: | 1.4 cm |
Number of letters: | 2 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | damaged, fragmentary |
Date of inscription: | 3rd–1st centuries BC [from object] |
Date derived from: | archaeological context [from object] |
| |
Language: | Raetic |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | TM 653631 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 324 |
Images
Object VN-15 bone with inscription VN-15.
|
Inscription VN-15 - line 1.
|
Inscription VN-15 - line 2.
|
Commentary
First published in Schumacher 2004: 324.
Picture in Schumacher 2004: Taf. 13,7 (drawing).
A number of well visible scratches arranged in what appear to be two lines, cut short by the breaking edge. If letters, they seem to be inscribed upside-down; we will therefore describe the scratchings as looked at with the ? pointing to the left. The lower sequence may well represent with the lower part gone, and, though clumsily scratched, upside-down . The reading is supported by inscriptions VN-10 and VN-11, both containing the sequence χa (see there for interpretation). The upper line might conceivably be read ]iia, but would be atypical, and the single vertical scratches are too far apart to suggest an actual inscription. Cp. again VN-10, also on a bone, with three lines, one of them of doubtful status.