perkusiale: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|language=Raetic | |language=Raetic | ||
|analysis_morphemic={{m|perkusi(a)}}{{m|-(a)le}} | |analysis_morphemic={{m|perkusi(a)}}{{m|-(a)le}} | ||
|meaning= | |meaning=unknown | ||
|checklevel=5 | |checklevel=5 | ||
|problem= | |problem=Achtung links zu den Pertinentivsuffixen! | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
While the pertinentive suffix {{m|-(a)le}} is unproblematic, it is not clear whether {{w||perkusi}} or {{w||perkusia}} is an entire word or should be segmented further. An interpretation as a personal name (or theonym) is, however, likely; the segments {{m||-ku|ku}} and {{m||-si|si}} looking like common Raetic suffixes is probably coincidental. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 19:01, 3 March 2014
| Word | |
|---|---|
| Language: | Raetic |
| Word type: | proper noun |
|
| |
| Case: | pertinentive |
| Number: | singular |
|
| |
| Morphemic analysis: | perkusi(a)-(a)le |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Attestation: | SZ-22.1 (perkusiale/like iiuịị) (1) |
Commentary
While the pertinentive suffix -(a)le is unproblematic, it is not clear whether perkusi or perkusia is an entire word or should be segmented further. An interpretation as a personal name (or theonym) is, however, likely; the segments ku and si looking like common Raetic suffixes is probably coincidental.
