SZ-23 antler: Difference between revisions
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|inventory_number=13.453 | |inventory_number=13.453 | ||
|accessibility=repository | |accessibility=repository | ||
|source=PID: 19 | |source=PID: 19 et seq.; IR: 282 (No. 63), pl. L, fig. a; Nothdurfter 2002: 1150–1151 (list 3, No. 8) | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=1 | ||
|problem= | |problem=object name, classification: haft, grip | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Fragment probably haft of a knife or grip of a tool.<br>Broken in four small pieces of various dimensions; blackened by fire of which two are more highly blackened.<br>Recomposed the four pieces in the correct way, along an [[index::SZ-23|inscription]].<br>The fragments were correctly aligned by the project's archaeological draughtsman (cp. drawing), which led to their identification with another inscription-bearing object: In {{bib|PID}}, Whatmough, following Conway, described the object as a calcined broken fragment, probably of a knife-handle, similar to [[index::SZ-22 handle]], and "damaged at the top as well as on the left edge". While it is possible that Whatmough, who did not see the object himself, misinterpreted Conway's notes, examination of the breaking edges shows that the fragments have come apart only recently. The fragment was probably still in one piece when Conway saw it in 1908. In any case, Mancini did not in this description recognise the fragments he saw in the [[index::Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum|Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum]], and republished object(s) and inscription(s) as probably unpublished (No. 63 I, II and III in {{bib|IR}}). This duplication found its way into the corpus of {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}, wherefore the two sigla [[index::SZ-23]] and [[index::SZ-64]] were related. Also {{bib|Nothdurfter 2002}} notes the recomposed object as two differents at which he indicates one fragment as section of a grip or haft ({{bib|Nothdurfter 2002}}: 1151).<br>Mancini states confusing indications related to the material: In {{bib|IR}}: 63 he indicates antler as material, in {{bib|LIR}}: 102 he characterises one fragment either as bone or as antler, the other three fragments as bone in contrast to his edition of 1975 (cp. {{bib|IR}}). However the fragments are of antler. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 18:27, 28 February 2014
| Object | |
|---|---|
| Classification: | handle |
| Material: | antler |
| Condition: | damaged, fragmentary |
|
| |
| Site: | Sanzeno (Trento, Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy) |
| Coordinates (approx.): | 46° 21' 57.60" N, 11° 4' 30.00" E [from site] |
| Find date: | November 1908 |
| Current location: | Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum (repository) |
| Inventory Nr.: | 13.453 |
|
| |
| Inscription: | SZ-23 (]ilt[?) |
|
| |
| Sources: | PID: 19 et seq. IR: 282 (No. 63), pl. L, fig. a Nothdurfter 2002: 1150–1151 (list 3, No. 8) |
Images
 Object SZ-23 antler with inscription SZ-23.
|
Commentary
Fragment probably haft of a knife or grip of a tool.
Broken in four small pieces of various dimensions; blackened by fire of which two are more highly blackened.
Recomposed the four pieces in the correct way, along an inscription.
The fragments were correctly aligned by the project's archaeological draughtsman (cp. drawing), which led to their identification with another inscription-bearing object: In PID, Whatmough, following Conway, described the object as a calcined broken fragment, probably of a knife-handle, similar to SZ-22 handle, and "damaged at the top as well as on the left edge". While it is possible that Whatmough, who did not see the object himself, misinterpreted Conway's notes, examination of the breaking edges shows that the fragments have come apart only recently. The fragment was probably still in one piece when Conway saw it in 1908. In any case, Mancini did not in this description recognise the fragments he saw in the Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, and republished object(s) and inscription(s) as probably unpublished (No. 63 I, II and III in IR). This duplication found its way into the corpus of Schumacher 1992, wherefore the two sigla SZ-23 and SZ-64 were related. Also Nothdurfter 2002 notes the recomposed object as two differents at which he indicates one fragment as section of a grip or haft (Nothdurfter 2002: 1151).
Mancini states confusing indications related to the material: In IR: 63 he indicates antler as material, in LIR: 102 he characterises one fragment either as bone or as antler, the other three fragments as bone in contrast to his edition of 1975 (cp. IR). However the fragments are of antler.
Bibliography
| IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
|---|---|
| LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
