NO-5: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{inscription | {{inscription | ||
|reading=unknown!]?a[ | |reading=unknown!(?)]?a[ | ||
|reading_original=]?{{c|A||d}}[ | |reading_original=(?)]?{{c|A||d}}[ | ||
|direction=ambiguous | |direction=ambiguous | ||
|letter_height_min=2 cm | |letter_height_min=2 cm | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in {{bib|Pauli 1888}}: 144 ff. Autopsied by TIR in October 2014. | |||
Images in {{bib|Pauli 1888}}: Tav. II,3 (drawing), {{bib|LIR}} (drawing). | |||
Dextroverse {{c||A|d}} on the right is clearly identifiable depite the missing top. The hasta to its left is slightly oblique. {{bib|Pauli 1888|Pauli}} read {{c||Φ}}, {{bib|PID|Whatmough}} suggested {{c||R|d}}, but in fact not even traces of bars can be verified. If anything, the straight breaking edge to the right of the hasta's top allows for a bar {{c||line d 20}}, yielding {{c||P2}}. The straight breaking edge on the left of the fragment may follow a hasta. {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} compares {{w||φausut}} on [[index::NO-7]], but note that the object is most certainly a ceramic fragment and not one of bone as assumed by {{bib|Pauli 1888|Pauli}}. | |||
Further references: {{bib|NRIE}} 110, {{bib|Battisti 1944}}: 234. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 19:05, 6 January 2015
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | (?)]?a[ |
| Original script: | (?)]? [
|
|
| |
| Object: | NO-5 bone () |
| Position: | outside |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
| Letter height: | 2 cm |
| Number of letters: | 2 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | incised |
| Current condition: | damaged, fragmentary |
| Date of inscription: | |
| Date derived from: | |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | PID 212 LIR ME-5 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 151 |
Images
 Object NO-5 potsherd with inscription NO-5.
|
Commentary
First published in Pauli 1888: 144 ff. Autopsied by TIR in October 2014.
Images in Pauli 1888: Tav. II,3 (drawing), LIR (drawing).
Dextroverse on the right is clearly identifiable depite the missing top. The hasta to its left is slightly oblique. Pauli read 
, Whatmough suggested 
, but in fact not even traces of bars can be verified. If anything, the straight breaking edge to the right of the hasta's top allows for a bar 
, yielding 
. The straight breaking edge on the left of the fragment may follow a hasta. Mancini compares φausut on NO-7, but note that the object is most certainly a ceramic fragment and not one of bone as assumed by Pauli.
Further references: NRIE 110, Battisti 1944: 234.
Bibliography
| Battisti 1944 | Carlo Battisti, "Osservazioni sulla lingua delle iscrizioni nell'alfabeto etrusco settentrionale di Bolzano", Studi Etruschi 18 (1944), 199–236. |
|---|---|
| LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
| Mayr 1957 | Karl M. Mayr, "Hirschhornvotive mit rätischen Inschriften aus Meclo (Mechel) am Nonsberg", Der Schlern 31 (1957), 230–231. |
