perkusiale: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|case=pertinentive | |case=pertinentive | ||
|language=Raetic | |language=Raetic | ||
|analysis_morphemic= | |analysis_morphemic=perkusi-a{{m|-le}} | ||
|meaning=unknown | |meaning=unknown | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
While the pertinentive suffix {{m|- | While the pertinentive suffix {{m||-le}} is unproblematic, it is not clear whether 1. the {{p||a}} is part of the base {{w||perkusia}} or of the suffix {{m||-le|-ale}}, and whether 2. it is an entire word or should be segmented further. An interpretation as a personal name (or theonym) is, however, likely. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:57, 11 February 2017
| Word | |
|---|---|
| Language: | Raetic |
| Word type: | proper noun |
|
| |
| Case: | pertinentive |
| Number: | singular |
|
| |
| Morphemic analysis: | perkusi-a-le |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Attestation: | SZ-22.1 (perkusiale/like iiuịị) (1) |
Commentary
While the pertinentive suffix -le is unproblematic, it is not clear whether 1. the a is part of the base perkusia or of the suffix -ale, and whether 2. it is an entire word or should be segmented further. An interpretation as a personal name (or theonym) is, however, likely.
