UG-2.2: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Unpublished. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014. | |||
Picture of the area concerned in {{bib|Mandl 2011}}: Abb. 134 (photo). Photo of the entire rock wall in {{bib|Mandl 2011}}: Abb. 97. | |||
The very doubtful remains of an inscription to the immediate right of [[index::UG-2.1]]. The trace of a frame line at the appropriate distance from the lower frame line of [[index::UG-2.1]] can be seen in the upper area (under {{c||U5|d}} through {{c||E|d}} of that inscription). Between these two lines, the faint traces of possibly intentional scratches may be guessed at. If we are indeed concerned with the remains of letters, the inscription must be older than [[index::UG-2.1]] to account for its much inferior condition. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 13:02, 5 August 2014
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | ? |
| Original script: | ? |
|
| |
| Object: | UG-2 rock (stone) (Inscriptions: UG-2.1, UG-2.2) |
| Position: | centre"centre" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property., right area"right area" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property. |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | unknown |
| Letter height: | 8 cm |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Current condition: | damaged |
| Date of inscription: | |
| Date derived from: | |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | none |
Images
Commentary
Unpublished. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014.
Picture of the area concerned in Mandl 2011: Abb. 134 (photo). Photo of the entire rock wall in Mandl 2011: Abb. 97.
The very doubtful remains of an inscription to the immediate right of UG-2.1. The trace of a frame line at the appropriate distance from the lower frame line of UG-2.1 can be seen in the upper area (under 
through 
of that inscription). Between these two lines, the faint traces of possibly intentional scratches may be guessed at. If we are indeed concerned with the remains of letters, the inscription must be older than UG-2.1 to account for its much inferior condition.
Bibliography
| Mandl 2011 | Franz Mandl, Felsbilder. Österreich – Bayern: Nördliche Kalkalpen [= Anisa – Verein für alpine Forschung 4], Haus im Ennstal: 2011. |
|---|
