SZ-30: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:
First published in {{bib|IR}}.<br>Pictures in {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XLI, fig. a and drawing) = {{bib|LIR}} (photo and drawing).<br>
First published in {{bib|IR}}.<br>Pictures in {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XLI, fig. a and drawing) = {{bib|LIR}} (photo and drawing).<br>
On fragment A. The presence of the rivetted edge before {{c|K|K2|d}} suggests that this fragment bears the beginning of the inscription.<br>
On fragment A. The presence of the rivetted edge before {{c|K|K2|d}} suggests that this fragment bears the beginning of the inscription.<br>
The signs are struck from what was apparently the inside of the situla, and are usually read from this side, even though dextroverse inscriptions are unusual. It is unlikely that the strokes would have been visible on the outside of the vessel even in the absence of copper rust. (Compare, however, [[index::IT-5]] where the '''positive side''' seems to have been the face side.) This raises the question of when and why the signs were embossed. It is generally assumed that the inscription was applied secondarily: The situla was dismantled and inscribed, possibly for votive purposes, on what had been the inside, apparently making use of two decorative lines as a frame for the letters.
The signs are struck from what was apparently the inside of the situla, and are usually read from this side, even though dextroverse inscriptions are unusual. It is unlikely that the strokes would have been visible on the outside of the vessel even in the absence of copper rust. (Compare, however, [[index::IT-5]] where the positive side seems to have been the face side.) This raises the question of when and why the signs were embossed. It is generally assumed that the inscription was applied secondarily: The situla was dismantled and inscribed, possibly for votive purposes, on what had been the inside, apparently making use of two decorative lines as a frame for the letters.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 13:44, 7 January 2014

Inscription
Transliteration: ka[
Original script: K2 dA3 d[

Object: SZ-30 situla (bronze)
Position: inside
Frame: Frame middle: top and bottomFrame middle: top and bottom   (none, top and bottom, none)
Script: North Italic script
Direction of writing: dextroverse
Letter height: 2.4 cm
Number of letters: 2
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: embossed
Current condition: fragmentary, restored
Date of inscription: 5th–4th centuries BC [from object]
Date derived from: typology [from object]

Language: Raetic
Meaning:

Alternative sigla: IR 29 A
LIR SA-22 A
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 139

Images

Commentary

First published in IR.
Pictures in IR (photo tav. XLI, fig. a and drawing) = LIR (photo and drawing).
On fragment A. The presence of the rivetted edge before K2 d suggests that this fragment bears the beginning of the inscription.
The signs are struck from what was apparently the inside of the situla, and are usually read from this side, even though dextroverse inscriptions are unusual. It is unlikely that the strokes would have been visible on the outside of the vessel even in the absence of copper rust. (Compare, however, IT-5 where the positive side seems to have been the face side.) This raises the question of when and why the signs were embossed. It is generally assumed that the inscription was applied secondarily: The situla was dismantled and inscribed, possibly for votive purposes, on what had been the inside, apparently making use of two decorative lines as a frame for the letters.

Bibliography

IR Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306.
LIR Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes)