SR-14: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|sigla_ir=96 | |sigla_ir=96 | ||
|sigla_mancini=SE-14 | |sigla_mancini=SE-14 | ||
|sigla_tm=218472 | |||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 159 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 159 | ||
|checklevel=1 | |checklevel=1 | ||
|problem=Soprintendenza | |problem=Soprintendenza? | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in {{bib|Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965}}: 16 (no. 14). Non vidi. | |||
Image in {{bib|Perini 1965b}}: Fig. 8,1 (drawing). | |||
Length of the remains 2.1 cm. Although there might be some of the inscription missing on the left side, what can be seen is symmetrical (judging by {{bib|Perini 1965b|Perini}}'s drawing) and is most probably non-script (a symbol, as already suspected by {{bib|Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965|Pellegrini}}). See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Latest revision as of 21:30, 8 November 2021
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ? |
Original script: | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| |
Object: | SR-14 potsherd (pottery) |
Position: | outside, side"side" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property. |
Orientation: | 0° |
Script: | none |
Direction of writing: | unknown |
Craftsmanship: | incised |
Current condition: | unknown |
Date of inscription: | 3rd century [from object] |
Date derived from: | archaeological context [from object] |
| |
Language: | none |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | IR 96 LIR SE-14 TM 218472 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 159 |
Commentary
First published in Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965: 16 (no. 14). Non vidi.
Image in Perini 1965b: Fig. 8,1 (drawing).
Length of the remains 2.1 cm. Although there might be some of the inscription missing on the left side, what can be seen is symmetrical (judging by Perini's drawing) and is most probably non-script (a symbol, as already suspected by Pellegrini). See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
Bibliography
IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
---|---|
LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |