AS-3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|condition=damaged | |condition=damaged | ||
|type_inscription=prob. mark of manufacturer | |type_inscription=prob. mark of manufacturer | ||
|sigla_pid=218 i a | |sigla_pid=218 (i a) | ||
|sigla_mancini=ROT-3 | |sigla_mancini=ROT-3 | ||
|sigla_mlr=110 (1) | |sigla_mlr=110 (1) | ||
|sigla_tm=218500 | |||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 167 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 167 | ||
|checklevel=0 | |checklevel=0 |
Latest revision as of 20:42, 8 November 2021
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ? iθθi |
Original script: | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| |
Object: | AS-3 potsherd (pottery) |
Position: | bottom |
Script: | unknown |
Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
Letter height: | 2 cm |
Number of characters: | 4 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | incised |
Current condition: | damaged |
Date of inscription: | end of the 4th-3rd centuries BC [from object] |
Date derived from: | archaeological context [from object] |
| |
Type: | prob. mark of manufacturer |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | PID 218 (i a) LIR ROT-3 MLR 110 (1) TM 218500 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 167 |
Commentary
First published in Pellegrini 1915: 120 f. Autopsied by TIR on 16th October 2015.
Image in Pellegrini 1915: tav. II, 23 (drawing).
Incised on the narrow bottom of the vessel. The characters are well legible, covering the entire breadth of the bottom; the sequence extends over 3.5 cm. To its left (assuming that the marks should be viewed with the vessel upside-down, as is the case with most of the corresponding inscriptions from Bostel), at a distance of about 1 cm, four vertical lines crossed by one oblique line. While this second mark so far has no parallel in Bostel, the sequence is also found on AS-15, in combination with a language-encoding inscription. Cp. also AS-2. In view of its reoccurrence in the same find place, the group can be interpreted as a manufacturer's mark.
Note that in Schumacher 2004, the ceramic fragment with inscription AS-3 is said to bear characters in four separate places – a misunderstanding of Whatmough's truncated presentation of the testimonies. The other three fragments mentioned by Pellegrini (p. 121):
PID (i) b = LIR ROT-4 = EX-101
PID (i) c = LIR ROT-13 = EX-102
PID (i) d = LIR ROT-14 = EX-103
are likely to represent partially damaged examples of the same sequence .
Bibliography
LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
---|