-si: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Corresponding to the Etruscan pertinentive I ({{bib|Rix 1985}}: 128, {{bib|Wallace 2008}}: 47). Like the ablative, the pertinentive is built with genitive forms as base ( | Corresponding to the Etruscan pertinentive I ({{bib|Rix 1985}}: 128, {{bib|Wallace 2008}}: 47). Like the ablative, the pertinentive is built with genitive forms / adjectives of possession as base ({{bib|Rix 1985}}: 127). The pertinentive is historically a locative to the genitive, hence the complex pertinentive endings reflect both those of genitive and locative (''locatiuus genitiui'' in Eichner's terminology). The pertinentive I is based on the genitive I {{m||-s(i)}}, historically -''si'': ''-si-i'' > ''-si''. In this context, auslauting {{p||i}} survived apocope (while being lost in the genitive). | ||
As might be expected, the use of the pertinentive I corresponds to that of the [[index::-s(i)|genitive I]], i.e. being the preferred allomorph for individual names not ending in a dental fricative. | As might be expected, the use of the pertinentive I corresponds to that of the [[index::-s(i)|genitive I]], i.e. being the preferred allomorph for individual names not ending in a dental fricative. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:08, 13 February 2017
| Morpheme | |
|---|---|
| Language: | Raetic, Etruscan |
| Type: | inflectional |
| Function: | pertinentive |
|
| |
| Attestation: | avaśuerasi, esimnesi, esumnesi, kastriesi, kuninasi, laθurusi, lastasi, pitaunesi, ritauiesi, )si, φelturiesi
|
Commentary
Corresponding to the Etruscan pertinentive I (Rix 1985: 128, Wallace 2008: 47). Like the ablative, the pertinentive is built with genitive forms / adjectives of possession as base (Rix 1985: 127). The pertinentive is historically a locative to the genitive, hence the complex pertinentive endings reflect both those of genitive and locative (locatiuus genitiui in Eichner's terminology). The pertinentive I is based on the genitive I -s(i), historically -si: -si-i > -si. In this context, auslauting i survived apocope (while being lost in the genitive).
As might be expected, the use of the pertinentive I corresponds to that of the genitive I, i.e. being the preferred allomorph for individual names not ending in a dental fricative.
