tianus: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
In isolation the most obvious segmentation is ''tianu''{{m||-s}} (benefactive genitive, see context in [[index::NO-15]]), but cp. {{w||tianusa}}, apparently with a base ''tianus'' plus | In isolation the most obvious segmentation is ''tianu''{{m||-s}} (benefactive genitive, see context in [[index::NO-15]]), but cp. {{w||tianusa}}, apparently with a base ''tianus'' plus [[index::-l(a)|genitive]]. In Raetic context, the vocalic auslaut of names makes {{w||tianu}} more likely than ''tianus'', though it may be objectionable to extend this rule from anthroponyms to (presumed) theonyms. Maybe a case of recutting? | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 13:34, 11 February 2017
| Word | |
|---|---|
| Language: | Raetic |
| Word type: | proper noun |
|
| |
| Number: | singular |
|
| |
| Meaning: | '(of/for?) Tianu*' |
|
| |
| Paradigm: | tianus (singular), tianusa (genitive, singular) (2) |
| Attestation: | NO-15 (esumnesinuþnualeutikutianus) (1) |
Commentary
In isolation the most obvious segmentation is tianu-s (benefactive genitive, see context in NO-15), but cp. tianusa, apparently with a base tianus plus genitive. In Raetic context, the vocalic auslaut of names makes tianu more likely than tianus, though it may be objectionable to extend this rule from anthroponyms to (presumed) theonyms. Maybe a case of recutting?
