NO-5: Difference between revisions
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{inscription | {{inscription | ||
|reading=unknown!(?)]?a[ | |reading=unknown!(?)]?a[ | ||
|reading_original=(?)]?{{c|A | |reading_original=(?)]?{{c|A}}[ | ||
|direction=ambiguous | |direction=ambiguous | ||
|letter_height_min=2 cm | |letter_height_min=2 cm | ||
|letter_number_min=2 | |letter_number_min=2 | ||
|line_number=1 | |line_number=1 | ||
|script=unknown | |script=unknown | ||
Line 24: | Line 23: | ||
Images in {{bib|Pauli 1888}}: Tav. II,3 (drawing), {{bib|Mayr 1957}}: Abb. 2 (photo), {{bib|LIR}} (drawing). | Images in {{bib|Pauli 1888}}: Tav. II,3 (drawing), {{bib|Mayr 1957}}: Abb. 2 (photo), {{bib|LIR}} (drawing). | ||
Dextroverse {{c||A | Dextroverse {{c||A}} on the right is clearly identifiable depite the missing top. The hasta to its left is slightly oblique. {{bib|Pauli 1888|Pauli}} read {{c||Φ}}, {{bib|PID|Whatmough}} suggested {{c||R|d}}, but in fact not even traces of bars can be verified. If anything, the straight breaking edge to the right of the hasta's top allows for a bar {{c||line d 20}}, yielding {{c||P2}}. The straight breaking edge on the left of the fragment may follow a hasta. {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} compares {{w||φausuθ}} on [[index::NO-7]], but note that the object is most certainly a ceramic fragment and not one of bone as assumed by {{bib|Pauli 1888|Pauli}} (for this purpose cp. also the [[index::NO-5 potsherd|page related to the object]]). | ||
Further references: {{bib|NRIE}} 110, {{bib|Battisti 1944}}: 234. | Further references: {{bib|NRIE}} 110, {{bib|Battisti 1944}}: 234. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Revision as of 14:48, 11 May 2016
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | (?)]?a[ |
Original script: | (?)]?![]() |
| |
Object: | NO-5 potsherd (pottery) |
Position: | outside |
Script: | unknown |
Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
Letter height: | 2 cm |
Number of letters: | 2 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | incised |
Current condition: | damaged, fragmentary |
Archaeological culture: | Late Iron Age [from object] |
Date of inscription: | 5th–1st centuries BC [from object] |
Date derived from: | archaeological context, cultural context [from object] |
| |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | PID 212 LIR ME-5 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 151 |
Images
Object NO-5 potsherd with inscription NO-5.
|
Commentary
First published in Pauli 1888: 144 ff. Autopsied by TIR in October 2014.
Images in Pauli 1888: Tav. II,3 (drawing), Mayr 1957: Abb. 2 (photo), LIR (drawing).
Dextroverse on the right is clearly identifiable depite the missing top. The hasta to its left is slightly oblique. Pauli read
, Whatmough suggested
, but in fact not even traces of bars can be verified. If anything, the straight breaking edge to the right of the hasta's top allows for a bar
, yielding
. The straight breaking edge on the left of the fragment may follow a hasta. Mancini compares φausuθ on NO-7, but note that the object is most certainly a ceramic fragment and not one of bone as assumed by Pauli (for this purpose cp. also the page related to the object).
Further references: NRIE 110, Battisti 1944: 234.
Bibliography
Battisti 1944 | Carlo Battisti, "Osservazioni sulla lingua delle iscrizioni nell'alfabeto etrusco settentrionale di Bolzano", Studi Etruschi 18 (1944), 199–236. |
---|---|
LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
Mayr 1957 | Karl M. Mayr, "Hirschhornvotive mit rätischen Inschriften aus Meclo (Mechel) am Nonsberg", Der Schlern 31 (1957), 230–231. |