AS-3: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:
Incised on the narrow bottom of the vessel. The characters are well legible, covering the entire breadth of the bottom; the sequence extends over 3.5 cm. To its left (assuming that the marks should be viewed with the vessel upside-down, as is the case with most of the corresponding inscriptions from [[index::Rotzo]]), at a distance of about 1 cm, four vertical lines crossed by one oblique line. While this second mark so far has no parallel in Rotzo, the sequence {{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}} is also found on [[index::AS-15]], in combination with a language-encoding inscription. Cp. also [[index::AS-2]].
Incised on the narrow bottom of the vessel. The characters are well legible, covering the entire breadth of the bottom; the sequence extends over 3.5 cm. To its left (assuming that the marks should be viewed with the vessel upside-down, as is the case with most of the corresponding inscriptions from [[index::Rotzo]]), at a distance of about 1 cm, four vertical lines crossed by one oblique line. While this second mark so far has no parallel in Rotzo, the sequence {{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}} is also found on [[index::AS-15]], in combination with a language-encoding inscription. Cp. also [[index::AS-2]].


Note that in {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}, the ceramic fragment with inscription AS-3 is said to bear characters in four separate places – a misunderstanding of {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}'s truncated presentation of the testimonies. The other three fragments mentioned by {{bib|Pellegrini 1915|Pellegrini}} (p. 121) ({{bib|PID}} (i) b = {{bib|LIR}} ROT-4 {{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}, (i) c = ROT-13 {{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}, (i) d = ROT-14 {{c||Θ}}) are likely to represent partially damaged examples of the same sequence {{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}. In view of its reoccurrence in the same find place, the group can be interpreted as a manufacturer's mark.
Note that in {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}, the ceramic fragment with inscription AS-3 is said to bear characters in four separate places – a misunderstanding of {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}'s truncated presentation of the testimonies. The other three fragments mentioned by {{bib|Pellegrini 1915|Pellegrini}} (p. 121):<br>
{{bib|PID}} (i) b = {{bib|LIR}} ROT-4 = [[index::Non-script notational systems|EX-101]] {{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}<br>
{{bib|PID}} (i) c = {{bib|LIR}} ROT-13 = [[index::Non-script notational systems|EX-102]] {{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}<br>
{{bib|PID}} (i) d = {{bib|LIR}} ROT-14 = [[index::Non-script notational systems|EX-103]] {{c||Θ}}<br>
are likely to represent partially damaged examples of the same sequence {{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}. In view of its reoccurrence in the same find place, the group can be interpreted as a manufacturer's mark.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 13:12, 4 November 2015

Inscription
Transliteration: § iθθi
Original script: I sΘ sΘ sI s

Object: AS-3 potsherd (pottery)
Position: bottom
Script: unknown
Direction of writing: ambiguous
Letter height: 2 cm
Number of characters: 4
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: incised
Current condition: damaged
Date of inscription: end of the 4th-3rd centuries BC [from object]
Date derived from: archaeological context [from object]

Type: prob. mark of manufacturer
Language: unknown
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: PID 218 i a
LIR ROT-3
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 167

Commentary

First published in Pellegrini 1915: 120 f. Autopsied by TIR on 16th October 2015.

Image in Pellegrini 1915: tav. II, 23 (drawing).

Incised on the narrow bottom of the vessel. The characters are well legible, covering the entire breadth of the bottom; the sequence extends over 3.5 cm. To its left (assuming that the marks should be viewed with the vessel upside-down, as is the case with most of the corresponding inscriptions from Rotzo), at a distance of about 1 cm, four vertical lines crossed by one oblique line. While this second mark so far has no parallel in Rotzo, the sequence I sΘ sΘ sI s is also found on AS-15, in combination with a language-encoding inscription. Cp. also AS-2.

Note that in Schumacher 2004, the ceramic fragment with inscription AS-3 is said to bear characters in four separate places – a misunderstanding of Whatmough's truncated presentation of the testimonies. The other three fragments mentioned by Pellegrini (p. 121):
PID (i) b = LIR ROT-4 = EX-101 Θ sΘ sI s
PID (i) c = LIR ROT-13 = EX-102 Θ sΘ s
PID (i) d = LIR ROT-14 = EX-103 Θ s
are likely to represent partially damaged examples of the same sequence I sΘ sΘ sI s. In view of its reoccurrence in the same find place, the group can be interpreted as a manufacturer's mark.

Bibliography

LIR Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes)