SZ-30 situla: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{object
{{object
|type_object=situla
|type_object=vessel
|type=Situla
|material=bronze
|material=bronze
|condition=fragmentary
|condition=fragmentary
|site=Sanzeno
|site=Sanzeno
|find_circumstances=old finding
|location=Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum
|location=Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum
|inventory_number=none
|inventory_number=none
|accessibility=on exhibition
|accessibility=on exhibition
|source=Schumacher 2004: 139
|source=Schumacher 2004: 139
|checklevel=3
|checklevel=1
|problem=size (gugsi) - Maße Fragmente sind schon angepasst an die neuen Fragmentbezeichnungen A-K
|problem=Bördelung Rand, Verzierungen, LitHinweis IR, nicht vergessen: die fragmente sind teilweise pickt - bitte angeben, was und wo (s. auch verweise hierher auf der inschriftenseite
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
Different fragments of a situla.<br>Thin sheet bronze. In the area of the fragment A the sheet bronze is rivetted; the rivets are still visible. A rivet is also visible at fragment I, probably the rivet for the handle. Patina from green to dark green in colour with white patches, mainly on fragment C, light green patches, mainly on fragment E, and brown patches, mainly on fragment B.<br>Several fragments of which some bear remains of a probably circumferential [[index::SZ-30|inscription]].<br>The inscription is inside and it can be supposed that the inscription was placed after the intentional damage. Therefore the situla can be considered as votive offering.<br>According to the [[index::Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum|museum]] at least the half of the complete situla is missing and so the sequence of the [[index::SZ-30|inscription]] is uncertain. The study of the different fragments however has shown that the sequence is not dubious and probably only a part between fragment C and D is missing. Concerning the missing part and his dimensions are different statements.<br>Dimensions of the different fragments:
* fragment A: 9 x 20.7 cm
* fragment A: 9 x 20.7 cm
* fragment B: 19.8 x 24.6 cm
* fragment B: 19.8 x 24.6 cm
Line 24: Line 27:
* fragment K: 14.7 x 6.9 cm
* fragment K: 14.7 x 6.9 cm


mehrere teile, einige davon mit resten einer Inschrift, die anscheinend rundrum gelaufen ist, allerdings innen, wahrscheinlich Anbringung nach Zerstörung, deswegen weiß mans nicht genau, lt Museum fehlt mindestens die hälfte, und die Reihenfolge ist unklar. [...] die reihenfolge ist doch nicht unklar, sondern passt eh so, und wenn was fehlt, dann zwischen 3 und 4. wie viel weiß man wiederum nicht - gugsi sagt, nicht gar viel, der sölder meint schon. nicht vergessen: die fragmente sind teilweise pickt - bitte angeben, was und wo (s. auch verweise hierher auf der inschriftenseite).
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 16:23, 4 June 2014

Object
Classification: vessel
Archaeological type: Situla
Material: bronze
Condition: fragmentary

Site: Sanzeno (Trento, Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy)
Coordinates (approx.): 46° 21' 57.60" N, 11° 4' 30.00" E [from site]
Find date:
Find circumstances: old finding
Current location: Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum (on exhibition)
Inventory Nr.: none

Inscription: SZ-30 (ka[? ?]isθi:puχe:̣ṭumis:p[ ]θiaḳ[? ?]auþile:ẹḷuku:̣)

Sources: Schumacher 2004: 139

Images

Commentary

Different fragments of a situla.
Thin sheet bronze. In the area of the fragment A the sheet bronze is rivetted; the rivets are still visible. A rivet is also visible at fragment I, probably the rivet for the handle. Patina from green to dark green in colour with white patches, mainly on fragment C, light green patches, mainly on fragment E, and brown patches, mainly on fragment B.
Several fragments of which some bear remains of a probably circumferential inscription.
The inscription is inside and it can be supposed that the inscription was placed after the intentional damage. Therefore the situla can be considered as votive offering.
According to the museum at least the half of the complete situla is missing and so the sequence of the inscription is uncertain. The study of the different fragments however has shown that the sequence is not dubious and probably only a part between fragment C and D is missing. Concerning the missing part and his dimensions are different statements.
Dimensions of the different fragments:

  • fragment A: 9 x 20.7 cm
  • fragment B: 19.8 x 24.6 cm
  • fragment C: 10.2 x 12 cm
  • fragment D: 12 x 12 cm
  • fragment E: 15.9 x 17.1 cm
  • fragment F: 8.7 x 3.6 cm
  • fragment G: 2.3 x 2.4 cm
  • fragment H: 1.9 x 2.3 cm
  • fragment I: 18 x 4.1 cm
  • fragment J: 7.8 x 4.5 cm
  • fragment K: 14.7 x 6.9 cm


Bibliography

IR Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306.