Θ: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{character | {{character | ||
|name=theta | |name=theta | ||
|sortform=11 | |sortform=11 | ||
|phoneme={{p||t}} | |phoneme={{p||t}} | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
|problem=Phonem | |problem=Phonem | ||
}} | }} | ||
Corresponds to ''t<sup>2</sup>'' in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}} and {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}. | Corresponds to ''t<sup>2</sup>'' in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}} and {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}. | ||
See [[index::Script]] and {{bib|Prosdocimi 1988}}: 332 ff. on the identification of St. Andrew's cross with Theta. The small variant {{c||Θ2}} is reminiscent of the Etruscan/Venetic protoform attested on Venetic *Es 120, but the low dating of the two objects bearing this variant makes an immediate correlation unlikely. | See [[index::Script]] and {{bib|Prosdocimi 1988}}: 332 ff. on the identification of St. Andrew's cross with Theta. The small variant {{c||Θ2}} is reminiscent of the Etruscan/Venetic protoform attested on Venetic *Es 120, but the low dating of the two objects bearing this variant makes an immediate correlation unlikely. | ||
A considerable number of St. Andrew's crosses | A considerable number of St. Andrew's crosses in the Raetic corpus come from non-script or para-script contexts, which must be considered when working with the statistics of character occurrence. See [[index::Non-script notational systems]]. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 13:33, 4 April 2016
| Character | |
|---|---|
| Customary name: | theta |
| Represents: | t |
Variants and attestation
| Transliteration | Sinistroverse | Dextroverse | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glyph | Number | Glyph | Number | |
| Θ | 
|
90 | 
|
14 |
| Θ2 | 
|
3 | 
|
0 |
Corresponds to t2 in Schumacher 1992 and Schumacher 2004.
See Script and Prosdocimi 1988: 332 ff. on the identification of St. Andrew's cross with Theta. The small variant 
is reminiscent of the Etruscan/Venetic protoform attested on Venetic *Es 120, but the low dating of the two objects bearing this variant makes an immediate correlation unlikely.
A considerable number of St. Andrew's crosses in the Raetic corpus come from non-script or para-script contexts, which must be considered when working with the statistics of character occurrence. See Non-script notational systems.
