ś: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
The phoneme written with the letter [[index::San]] may be expected to correspond to its Etruscan equivalent, i.e. a palatal sibilant (see {{bib|Wallace 2008}}: 31). The relations between ''ś'' and {{p||s}} in Raetic are not clear – the two appear in similar contexts, but there may be evidence for Wallace's Law (palatalisation of {{p||s}} before {{p||n}}) in {{w||aruśnas}} vs. {{w||aruse}}. ''ś'' might be argued to be the result of palatalisation in a number of forms, mainly patronyms in {{m||-nu}} (e.g. {{w||reituśnu}}, {{w||taśna}}), but {{p||s}} does also appear before {{p||n}}, most prominently in {{w||terisna}}. | The phoneme written with the letter [[index::San]] may be expected to correspond to its Etruscan equivalent, i.e. a palatal sibilant (see {{bib|Wallace 2008}}: 31). The relations between ''ś'' and {{p||s}} in Raetic are not clear – the two appear in similar contexts, but there may be evidence for Wallace's Law (palatalisation of {{p||s}} before {{p||n}}) in {{w||aruśnas}} vs. {{w||aruse}}. ''ś'' might be argued to be the result of palatalisation in a number of forms, mainly patronyms in {{m||-nu}}/{{m||-na}} (e.g. {{w||reituśnu}}, {{w||taśna}}), but {{p||s}} does also appear before {{p||n}}, most prominently in {{w||terisna}}. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 15:57, 16 February 2016
| Phoneme | |
|---|---|
| Type: | consonant |
| IPA (approx.): | ʃ |
|
| |
| Graphematic representation: | |
| Attested in: | Words: 0, Morphemes: 0 |
Commentary
The phoneme written with the letter San may be expected to correspond to its Etruscan equivalent, i.e. a palatal sibilant (see Wallace 2008: 31). The relations between ś and s in Raetic are not clear – the two appear in similar contexts, but there may be evidence for Wallace's Law (palatalisation of s before n) in aruśnas vs. aruse. ś might be argued to be the result of palatalisation in a number of forms, mainly patronyms in -nu/-na (e.g. reituśnu, taśna), but s does also appear before n, most prominently in terisna.
