z: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|type_phoneme=consonant | |type_phoneme=consonant | ||
|ipa=[ts] | |ipa=[ts] | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=2 | ||
|problem=Anzeige graphematic representation; Stellung von Þ ausschließlich im Anlaut und zwischen Vokal (außer NO-15, wohl wegen Synkope bei Morphemanfügung) - wie im Fall von Zeta? | |||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | |||
See [[index::Þ]] for details. The equations of {{w||þinaχe}} and {{w||þal}} with Etruscan {{w||zinake}} and {{w||zal}} suggest a dental affricate of some description (for the pronunciation of Etruscan /z/ see {{bib|Wallace 2008}}: 31 f.). For the question of whether Zeta was also used to write ''z'', see [[index::Z]]. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 16:53, 17 April 2015
| Phoneme | |
|---|---|
| Type: | consonant |
| IPA (approx.): | [ts] |
|
| |
| Graphematic representation: | Þ (thorn) |
| Attested in: | Words: 0, Morphemes: 0 |
Commentary
See Þ for details. The equations of þinaχe and þal with Etruscan zinake and zal suggest a dental affricate of some description (for the pronunciation of Etruscan /z/ see Wallace 2008: 31 f.). For the question of whether Zeta was also used to write z, see Z.
