NO-10 slab: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
|inventory_number=6445
|inventory_number=6445
|source=Zamboni 2011: 640
|source=Zamboni 2011: 640
|checklevel=0
|checklevel=5
|problem=detailed object description
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
Porphyry slab in subpiramidal irregular form. On one of the major flanks is incised an [[index::NO-10|inscription||this side]] which contains single line.<br>In default of the find context the dating in general is related with the second part of the Iron Age, i.e. 5th-1st centuries BC. Due to the missing find information the function of the slab -possibly a funerary cippus- is as well uncertain.
Porphyry slab in subpiramidal irregular form. On one of the major flanks is incised an [[index::NO-10|inscription||this side]] which contains single line.<br>In default of the find context the dating in general is related with the second part of the Iron Age, i.e. 5th-1st centuries BC. Due to the missing find information the function of the slab -possibly a funerary cippus- is as well uncertain.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 13:06, 2 February 2015

Object
Classification: slab
Material: porphyry
Size: length 62 cm, height 24 cm
Condition: fragmentary
Date: 5th–1st centuries BC
Date derived from: unknown

Site: Tavòn (fraction of: Coredo, Trento, Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy)
Coordinates (approx.): 46° 21' 50.40" N, 11° 5' 52.80" E [from site]
Find date: unknown
Find circumstances: unknown
Current location: Castello del Buonconsiglio
Inventory Nr.: 6445

Inscription: NO-10 (rileke:sa)

Sources: Zamboni 2011: 640

Images

Commentary

Porphyry slab in subpiramidal irregular form. On one of the major flanks is incised an inscription which contains single line.
In default of the find context the dating in general is related with the second part of the Iron Age, i.e. 5th-1st centuries BC. Due to the missing find information the function of the slab -possibly a funerary cippus- is as well uncertain.

Bibliography