Þ: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Martin Braun (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{character | {{character | ||
|name=thorn | |name=thorn | ||
|script=North Italic | |script=North Italic Script | ||
|sortform=26 | |sortform=26 | ||
|phoneme= | |phoneme= | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
* the arrow-shape {{c||Þ3}} a variant of [[index::T|Tau]]? | |||
* the arrow-shape a variant of Tau? | * the shape with a round head {{c||Þ4}} a variant of [[index::Z|Zeta]]? (with circle only in the embossed inscriptions on helmets?) see [[index::SL-1.1]] and [[index::SL-2.3]]. Marstrander 1927: 20 ff.: similar forms in Sabellian inscriptions (on Gt 1 probably rather D from Latin influence). If the same development as in Sabellian occurred here - is the variant with one head primary (developed from the arrow-shape [[index::T|Tau]], with the form in [[index::SL-2.3]] singular; possible reasons see there), or ist the variant with head and foot primary (developed from [[index::Z|Zeta]]; then why only documented once - and wherefore simplified?) | ||
* the shape with a round head a variant of Zeta? (with circle only in the embossed inscriptions on helmets?) see [[index::SL-1.1]] and [[index::SL-2.3]]. Marstrander 1927: 20 ff.: similar forms in Sabellian inscriptions (on Gt 1 probably rather D from Latin influence). If the same development as in Sabellian | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 16:49, 2 March 2014
| Character | |
|---|---|
| Customary name: | thorn |
Variants and attestation
| Transliteration | Sinistroverse | Dextroverse | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glyph | Number | Glyph | Number | |
| Þ | 
|
3 | 
|
2 |
| Þ2 | 
|
0 | 
|
1 |
| Þ3 | 
|
12 | 
|
2 |
Commentary
- the arrow-shape
a variant of Tau? - the shape with a round head Þ4 s a variant of Zeta? (with circle only in the embossed inscriptions on helmets?) see SL-1.1 and SL-2.3. Marstrander 1927: 20 ff.: similar forms in Sabellian inscriptions (on Gt 1 probably rather D from Latin influence). If the same development as in Sabellian occurred here - is the variant with one head primary (developed from the arrow-shape Tau, with the form in SL-2.3 singular; possible reasons see there), or ist the variant with head and foot primary (developed from Zeta; then why only documented once - and wherefore simplified?)
