VR-5: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The inscription VR-5 was included in the Raetic corpus by {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 172, 340 f. based on Whatmough's ascription in {{bib|PID}}. As in the older literature, it is today judged to belong in the Cisalpine Celtic corpus both epigraphically and linguistically. Consequently, the document has been transferred to ''Lexicon Leponticum'' with the new siglum [http://www.univie.ac.at/lexlep/wiki/ | The inscription VR-5 was included in the Raetic corpus by {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 172, 340 f. based on Whatmough's ascription in {{bib|PID}}. As in the older literature, it is today judged to belong in the Cisalpine Celtic corpus both epigraphically and linguistically. Consequently, the document has been transferred to ''Lexicon Leponticum'' with the new siglum [http://www.univie.ac.at/lexlep/wiki/VR·19 VR·19]. | ||
[[text_plain::''see LexLep''| ]] | [[text_plain::''see LexLep''| ]] | ||
[[sortform::VR_005_000| ]] | [[sortform::VR_005_000| ]] | ||
[[Category:Non-inscription]] | [[Category:Non-inscription]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:46, 29 June 2020
The inscription VR-5 was included in the Raetic corpus by Schumacher 2004: 172, 340 f. based on Whatmough's ascription in PID. As in the older literature, it is today judged to belong in the Cisalpine Celtic corpus both epigraphically and linguistically. Consequently, the document has been transferred to Lexicon Leponticum with the new siglum VR·19.
