VR-5: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The inscription VR-5 was included in the Raetic corpus by {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}} based on Whatmough's ascription in the {{bib|PID}}. As in the older literature, it is today judged to belong in the Lepontic corpus both epigraphically and linguistically. Consequently, the object and inscription pages (with argumentation) are to be found in [http://www.univie.ac.at/lexlep/wiki/VR-5 LexLep].   
The inscription VR-5 was included in the Raetic corpus by {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 172, 340f. based on Whatmough's ascription in {{bib|PID}}. As in the older literature, it is today judged to belong in the Cisalpine Celtic corpus both epigraphically and linguistically. Consequently, the document has been transferred to ''Lexicon Leponticum'' with the new siglum [http://www.univie.ac.at/lexlep/wiki/VR·35 VR·35].   


[[text_plain::''see LexLep''| ]]
[[text_plain::''see LexLep''| ]]
[[sortform::VR_005_000| ]]
[[sortform::VR_005_000| ]]
[[Category:Non-inscription]]
[[Category:Non-inscription]]

Revision as of 20:45, 21 April 2020

The inscription VR-5 was included in the Raetic corpus by Schumacher 2004: 172, 340f. based on Whatmough's ascription in PID. As in the older literature, it is today judged to belong in the Cisalpine Celtic corpus both epigraphically and linguistically. Consequently, the document has been transferred to Lexicon Leponticum with the new siglum VR·35.