SZ-67: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|reading=liṣụạụṛi·̣§ | |reading=liṣụạụṛi·̣§ | ||
|reading_original={{c|punctuation|punctuation7}}{{c|I}}{{c|R}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|A|A21}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|S}}{{c|I}}{{c|L}} | |reading_original={{c|punctuation|punctuation7}}{{c|I}}{{c|R}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|A|A21}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|S}}{{c|I}}{{c|L}} | ||
|reading_variant=piṣụạụṛi·̣ | |reading_variant=piṣụạụṛi·̣ | ||
|direction=sinistroverse | |direction=sinistroverse | ||
|letter_height_min= | |letter_height_min=0.8 cm | ||
|word_number=0 | |word_number=0 | ||
|line_number=1 | |line_number=1 | ||
| Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 228 (5).<br>Further references: {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 225.<br>Pictures in {{bib|Franz 1959}}: Taf. 3,2 (drawing), {{bib|IR}} (drawing) and {{bib| | First published in {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 228 (5).<br>Further references: {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 225.<br>Pictures in {{bib|Franz 1959}}: Taf. 3,2 (drawing), {{bib|IR}} (drawing) and {{bib|LIR}} (photo and drawing).<br>Heavily corroded. While a number of strokes is clearly distinguishable, a reading can only be achieved by taking into consideration some doubtful traces of slighter strokes, namely the twig of {{c|A|A21}} (no inlay) and the lowest stroke of {{c|S}}, which might as well belong with a group of scratches under the inscription. A similar scratch may be detected under {{c|R}}, which could then also be read as {{c|S}}{{c|I}}, as well as under {{c|A|A21}}, turning it into {{c|V}}. The stroke interpreted as a punctuation mark (no inlay) may have been longer and completed the symmetrical "symbol" at the end of the line. Then again, the rightmost half of this symbol could easily be reads as {{c|A|A5}}, and the leftmost stroke features a twig at the top (no inlay), thus repeating the shape of the first sign read as {{c|L}}. The white inlay in the area of the "symbol" may show more than is really there. The reading is highly doubtful, pseudo-script cannot be excluded. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 20:29, 21 November 2013
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | liṣụạụṛi·̣§ |
| Original script: |       
|
| Variant Reading: | piṣụạụṛi·̣ |
|
| |
| Object: | SZ-67 situla () |
| Position: | centre"centre" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property., handle, outside |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
| Letter height: | 0.8 cm |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | chased"chased" is not in the list (painted, cast, unknown, engraved, incised, incised before firing, embossed, impressed) of allowed values for the "craftsmanship" property. |
| Current condition: | complete, damaged, restored |
| Date of inscription: | |
| Date derived from: | |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | IR 66 LIR SA-23 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 148 |
Images
 Object SZ-67 handle with inscription SZ-67.
|
Commentary
First published in Franz 1959: 228 (5).
Further references: Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 225.
Pictures in Franz 1959: Taf. 3,2 (drawing), IR (drawing) and LIR (photo and drawing).
Heavily corroded. While a number of strokes is clearly distinguishable, a reading can only be achieved by taking into consideration some doubtful traces of slighter strokes, namely the twig of (no inlay) and the lowest stroke of , which might as well belong with a group of scratches under the inscription. A similar scratch may be detected under , which could then also be read as , as well as under , turning it into 
. The stroke interpreted as a punctuation mark (no inlay) may have been longer and completed the symmetrical "symbol" at the end of the line. Then again, the rightmost half of this symbol could easily be reads as 
, and the leftmost stroke features a twig at the top (no inlay), thus repeating the shape of the first sign read as . The white inlay in the area of the "symbol" may show more than is really there. The reading is highly doubtful, pseudo-script cannot be excluded.
Bibliography
| Franz 1959 | Leonhard Franz, "Rätische Inschriften im Innsbrucker Landesmuseum", Der Schlern 33 (1959), 228–229. |
|---|---|
| IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
| LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
