NO-9: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 152, 336 f. | |source=Schumacher 2004: 152, 336 f. | ||
|checklevel=1 | |checklevel=1 | ||
|problem=position: wie heißt das teil? oder upper area (nach zeichnung)? nedoma | |problem=position: wie heißt das teil? oder upper area (nach zeichnung)? nedoma checken | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}.<br>Pictures in '''{{bib|Gehring 1976}}: Taf. 17 (drawing)''' = {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 2,1 (drawing) and {{bib|LIR}} (drawing).<br>Inscribed from the head towards the foot of the fibula, the signs getting ever smaller. Length 1.6 cm. The strokes cross the casting seam. If the signs are letters and are segmented as above, the writer must have struck the lower part of the second {{c|A|A7|d}} twice, because the first stroke came out too straight. {{bib|Nedoma 1995}} regards the last two signs as marks designating the end of the line (p. 28, Fn. 42). Pseudo-script cannot be excluded; the strokes can also be arranged into a reasonably symmetrical zig-zag pattern. | First published in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}.<br>Pictures in '''{{bib|Gehring 1976}}: Taf. 17 (drawing)''' = {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 2,1 (drawing) and {{bib|LIR}} (drawing).<br>Inscribed from the head towards the foot of the fibula, the signs getting ever smaller. Length 1.6 cm. The strokes cross the casting seam. If the signs are letters and are segmented as above, the writer must have struck the lower part of the second {{c|A|A7|d}} twice, because the first stroke came out too straight. {{bib|Nedoma 1995}} regards the last two signs as marks designating the end of the line (p. 28, Fn. 42). Pseudo-script cannot be excluded; the strokes can also be arranged into a reasonably symmetrical zig-zag pattern. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 02:02, 20 December 2013
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | auliaịạ |
| Original script: |     
|
| Variant Reading: | § |
|
| |
| Object: | NO-9 fibula (bronze) |
| Position: | upper area"upper area" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property. |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
| Letter height: | 0.10.1 cm <br /> – 0.5 cm |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | embossed |
| Current condition: | complete |
| Archaeological culture: | La Tène D [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | early 1st century BC [from object] |
| Date derived from: | typology [from object] |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | LIR ME-7 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 152, 336 f. |
Commentary
First published in Schumacher 1992.
Pictures in Gehring 1976: Taf. 17 (drawing) = Schumacher 2004: Taf. 2,1 (drawing) and LIR (drawing).
Inscribed from the head towards the foot of the fibula, the signs getting ever smaller. Length 1.6 cm. The strokes cross the casting seam. If the signs are letters and are segmented as above, the writer must have struck the lower part of the second twice, because the first stroke came out too straight. Nedoma 1995 regards the last two signs as marks designating the end of the line (p. 28, Fn. 42). Pseudo-script cannot be excluded; the strokes can also be arranged into a reasonably symmetrical zig-zag pattern.
Bibliography
| Gehring 1976 | Brigitte Gehring, "Die Fibeln von Mechel (Meclo) im Nonsberg", Archaeologia Austriaca 59–60 (1976), 143–173. |
|---|---|
| LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
