NO-5: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{inscription
{{inscription
|reading=unknown!(?)]?a[
|reading=unknown!(?)]?a[
|reading_original=(?)]?{{c|A||d}}[
|reading_original=(?)]?{{c|A}}[
|direction=ambiguous
|direction=ambiguous
|letter_height_min=2 cm
|letter_height_min=2 cm
|letter_number_min=2
|letter_number_min=2
|word_number=0
|line_number=1
|line_number=1
|script=unknown
|script=unknown
|language=unknown
|language=unknown
|meaning=unknown
|meaning=unknown
|object=NO-5 bone
|object=NO-5 potsherd
|position=outside
|position=outside
|craftsmanship=incised
|craftsmanship=incised
Line 16: Line 15:
|sigla_pid=212
|sigla_pid=212
|sigla_mancini=ME-5
|sigla_mancini=ME-5
|sigla_tm=218448
|source=Schumacher 2004: 151
|source=Schumacher 2004: 151
|checklevel=1
|checklevel=0
|problem=check: das is ton, kein knochen?
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
First published in {{bib|Pauli 1888}}: 144 ff. Autopsied by TIR in October 2014.
First published in {{bib|Pauli 1888}}: 144 ff. Autopsied by TIR in October 2014.


Images in {{bib|Pauli 1888}}: Tav. II,3 (drawing), {{bib|LIR}} (drawing).
Images in {{bib|Pauli 1888}}: Tav. II,3 (drawing), {{bib|Mayr 1957}}: Abb. 2 (photo), {{bib|LIR}} (drawing).


Dextroverse {{c||A|d}} on the right is clearly identifiable depite the missing top. The hasta to its left is slightly oblique. {{bib|Pauli 1888|Pauli}} read {{c||Φ}}, {{bib|PID|Whatmough}} suggested {{c||R|d}}, but in fact not even traces of bars can be verified. If anything, the straight breaking edge to the right of the hasta's top allows for a bar {{c||line d 20}}, yielding {{c||P2}}. The straight breaking edge on the left of the fragment may follow a hasta. {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} compares {{w||φausut}} on [[index::NO-7]], but note that the object is most certainly a ceramic fragment and not one of bone as assumed by {{bib|Pauli 1888|Pauli}}.  
Dextroverse {{c||A}} on the right is clearly identifiable depite the missing top. The hasta to its left is slightly oblique. {{bib|Pauli 1888|Pauli}} read {{c||Φ}}, {{bib|PID|Whatmough}} suggested {{c||R|d}}, but in fact not even traces of bars can be verified. If anything, the straight breaking edge to the right of the hasta's top allows for a bar {{c||line d 20}}, yielding {{c||P2}}. The straight breaking edge on the left of the fragment may follow a hasta. {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} compares {{w||φausuθ}} on [[index::NO-7]], but note that the object is most certainly a ceramic fragment and not one of bone as assumed by {{bib|Pauli 1888|Pauli}} (for this purpose cp. also the [[index::NO-5 potsherd|page related to the object]]).  


Further references: {{bib|NRIE}} 110, {{bib|Battisti 1944}}: 234.  
Further references: {{bib|NRIE}} 110, {{bib|Battisti 1944}}: 234.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 20:13, 8 November 2021

Inscription
Transliteration: (?)]?a[
Original script: (?)]?A s[

Object: NO-5 potsherd (pottery)
Position: outside
Script: unknown
Direction of writing: ambiguous
Letter height: 2 cm
Number of letters: 2
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: incised
Current condition: damaged, fragmentary
Archaeological culture: Late Iron Age [from object]
Date of inscription: 5th–1st centuries BC [from object]
Date derived from: archaeological context, cultural context [from object]

Language: unknown
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: PID 212
LIR ME-5
TM 218448
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 151

Images

Commentary

First published in Pauli 1888: 144 ff. Autopsied by TIR in October 2014.

Images in Pauli 1888: Tav. II,3 (drawing), Mayr 1957: Abb. 2 (photo), LIR (drawing).

Dextroverse A s on the right is clearly identifiable depite the missing top. The hasta to its left is slightly oblique. Pauli read Φ s, Whatmough suggested R d, but in fact not even traces of bars can be verified. If anything, the straight breaking edge to the right of the hasta's top allows for a bar line d 20 s, yielding P2 s. The straight breaking edge on the left of the fragment may follow a hasta. Mancini compares φausuθ on NO-7, but note that the object is most certainly a ceramic fragment and not one of bone as assumed by Pauli (for this purpose cp. also the page related to the object).

Further references: NRIE 110, Battisti 1944: 234.

Bibliography

Battisti 1944 Carlo Battisti, "Osservazioni sulla lingua delle iscrizioni nell'alfabeto etrusco settentrionale di Bolzano", Studi Etruschi 18 (1944), 199–236.
LIR Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes)
Mayr 1957 Karl M. Mayr, "Hirschhornvotive mit rätischen Inschriften aus Meclo (Mechel) am Nonsberg", Der Schlern 31 (1957), 230–231.