IT-6: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{inscription | {{inscription | ||
|reading=aiθiu | |reading=aiθiu | ||
|reading_original={{c|U}}{{c|I}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|I}}{{c|A | |reading_original={{c|U}}{{c|I}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|I}}{{c|A}} | ||
|direction=ambiguous | |direction=ambiguous | ||
|sign_number=3 | |sign_number=3 | ||
|sign_number_max=5 | |sign_number_max=5 | ||
|line_number=1 | |line_number=1 | ||
|script=unknown | |script=unknown | ||
| Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Not previously published. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014. | |||
Picture in {{bib|Tischer 2006}}: 215, fig. 13 (photo), {{bib|MLR}} (photo). | Picture in {{bib|Tischer 2006}}: 215, fig. 13 (photo), {{bib|MLR}} (photo). | ||
Despite the unambiguous {{c||A | Despite the unambiguous {{c||A}}, possibly non- or pseudo-script. The two vertical scratches on both sides of the St. Andrew's cross are very close to the latter, suggesting the shape of the "butterfly San" {{c||addŚ2}} characteristic of Lepontic. Cp. [[index::SR-11]]. See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 14:47, 11 May 2016
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | aiθiu |
| Original script: |    
|
|
| |
| Object: | IT-6 stone (stone) |
| Position: | front |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
| Number of characters: | 3 – 5 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | engraved |
| Current condition: | complete |
| Archaeological culture: | La Tène [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | |
| Date derived from: | |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | MLR 96 |
Images
 Object IT-6 stone with inscription IT-6 - upper side.
|
 Object IT-6 stone with inscription IT-6 - axonometry.
|
 Inscription IT-6.
|
Commentary
Not previously published. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014.
Picture in Tischer 2006: 215, fig. 13 (photo), MLR (photo).
Despite the unambiguous , possibly non- or pseudo-script. The two vertical scratches on both sides of the St. Andrew's cross are very close to the latter, suggesting the shape of the "butterfly San" 
characteristic of Lepontic. Cp. SR-11. See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
