BZ-26: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{inscription
{{inscription
|reading=unknown!?]i : perisna!perisṇ[
|reading=unknown!?]i : terisna!terisṇ[
|reading_original=]{{c|N}}{{c|S}}{{c|I}}{{c|R}}{{c|E}}{{c|P|P2}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation3}}{{c|I}}[?
|reading_original=]{{c|N}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|R}}{{c|E}}{{c|T|T3}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation3}}{{c|I}}[?
|direction=sinistroverse
|direction=sinistroverse
|letter_height_min=1.7 cm
|letter_height_min=1.7 cm
Line 12: Line 12:
|language=Raetic
|language=Raetic
|meaning=unknown
|meaning=unknown
|object=BZ-26 helmet
|object=BZ-26 fragment
|position=rim
|position=rim
|orientation=0
|orientation=0
|craftsmanship=engraved
|craftsmanship=engraved
|condition=damaged, fragmentary
|condition=damaged, fragmentary
|sigla_tm=653544
|checklevel=1
|checklevel=1
|problem=Verweis P vs. Z
|problem=Objektverlinkung
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
Line 25: Line 26:
Images in {{bib|Lunz & Morandi 2003}}: Fig. 3 (photo) and 4 (drawing).
Images in {{bib|Lunz & Morandi 2003}}: Fig. 3 (photo) and 4 (drawing).


Length of the remains 5.5 cm. The lines are thin, but well visible; the reading is unambiguous. On the right, the remains of two vertical lines, the left of which can hardly be anything else than {{c||I}}. The separator consists in three short vertical scratches, and does not come up to the height of the letters. The hasta of {{c||E}} is inclined in writing direction; the second bar of {{c||N}} runs along the breaking edge. The identification of the first letter after the separator as {{c||P2}} (rather than {{c||T|d}} or {{c||Þ3}}) is indisputable; see [[index::SL-1]] and '''???''' for a discussion. We can amend to {{w||perisna}}. Cp. [[index::BZ-4]], where this word is preceded by {{w||ipi}}, which matches the remains of letters before the separator and might conceivably be the case here as well.  
Length of the remains 5.5 cm. The lines are thin, but well visible; the reading is unambiguous. On the right, the remains of two vertical lines, the left of which can hardly be anything else than {{c||I}}. The separator consists in three short vertical scratches, and does not come up to the height of the letters. The hasta of {{c||E}} is inclined in writing direction; the second bar of {{c||N}} runs along the breaking edge. We can amend to {{w||terisna}}. Cp. [[index::BZ-4]], where this word is also preceded by a sequence ending in {{p||i}}. Cp. also [[index::BZ-27]].
 
 
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 20:57, 8 November 2021

Inscription
Transliteration: ?]i : terisṇ[
Original script: ]N sS dI sR sE sT3 spunctuation3 sI s[?

Object: BZ-26 fragment (bronze)
Position: rim
Orientation:
Script: North Italic script (Sanzeno alphabet)
Direction of writing: sinistroverse
Letter height: 1.7 cm
Number of letters: 7
Number of characters: 8
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: engraved
Current condition: damaged, fragmentary
Date of inscription: 2nd half of the 5th century–1st century BC [from object]
Date derived from: typology [from object]

Language: Raetic
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: TM 653544

Images

Commentary

First published in Lunz & Morandi 2003: 345 ff.

Images in Lunz & Morandi 2003: Fig. 3 (photo) and 4 (drawing).

Length of the remains 5.5 cm. The lines are thin, but well visible; the reading is unambiguous. On the right, the remains of two vertical lines, the left of which can hardly be anything else than I s. The separator consists in three short vertical scratches, and does not come up to the height of the letters. The hasta of E s is inclined in writing direction; the second bar of N s runs along the breaking edge. We can amend to terisna. Cp. BZ-4, where this word is also preceded by a sequence ending in i. Cp. also BZ-27.

Bibliography

Lunz & Morandi 2003 Reimo Lunz, Alessandro Morandi, "Un frammento di elmo di bronzo con iscrizione retica da Settequerce – Siebeneich", Archeologia Classica LIV (2003), 341–349.