BZ-10.2: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{inscription
{{inscription
|reading=unknown
|reading=?
|reading_original=unknown
|reading_original=?
|direction=unknown
|direction=unknown
|word_number=0
|word_number=0
Line 7: Line 7:
|script=unknown
|script=unknown
|language=unknown
|language=unknown
|meaning=unknown
|object=BZ-10 slab
|object=BZ-10 slab
|position=back, right-hand side
|position=back, right-hand side
Line 15: Line 16:
|sigla_mancini=BZ-13 b
|sigla_mancini=BZ-13 b
|source=Schumacher 2004: 181, 341 f.
|source=Schumacher 2004: 181, 341 f.
|checklevel=5
|checklevel=3
|problem=Literatur LIR, Abb bei Sulzer (PID); Lesungen, tiefe ritzungen vs weiße striche
|problem=Literatur; Gugsi wg Strichen fragen sowie Zeichenhöhe u./o. Länge
|disambiguation=BZ-10
}}
}}
== Commentary==
== Commentary==
First published in '''{{bib|Sulzer 1855}}: 307'''.<br>Further references: {{bib|AIF I}} 36, {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 229.<br>'''Picture in {{bib|AIF I}}: Taf. II (drawing '''nach Fabretti''')'''.<br>Hardly readable due to corrosion. Autopsy was impeded by the fact that the slab is currently on exhibition, fixedly attatched to the ground with its back to a wall.
First published in '''{{bib|CII}} 24'''. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
 
Pictures in {{bib|Sulzer 1855}}: Tav. IX (drawing), '''{{bib|Schneller 1866}}: Taf. II, Fig. 3''', {{bib|CII}}: tab. II (drawing = {{bib|AIF I}}: Taf. II,36 A), {{bib|Giovanelli 1876}}: Taf. II, No. 4, '''{{bib|Oberziner 1883b}}: tab. XX''' and {{bib|LIR}} (drawing).
 
Hardly readable due to weathering. Autopsy was impeded by the fact that the slab is currently on exhibition, fixedly attatched to the ground with its back to a wall. The shapes reproduced in older drawings could to some extent be ascertained, but the scratches are unequal – some deep and broad, some more fine and shallow and white in colour. {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} did not include all the traces in his drawing. Though one may assume that the stone was in better condition when examined by the scholars of the 19<sup>th</sup> century, from a modern point of view it is doubtful whether we are concerned with the remains of an inscription, or merely damages.
 
Further references: {{bib|Sulzer 1855}}: 307, '''{{bib|Weber 1861}}: 36''', '''{{bib|Schneller 1866}}: 198 f.''', {{bib|Giovanelli 1876}}: 97, '''{{bib|Pichler 1880}}: 41 (no. 5)''', '''{{bib|Oberziner 1883b}}: 150''', {{bib|AIF I}} 36, {{bib|Battisti 1944}}: 227 f., '''{{bib|Pisani 1953}} 321'''.
 
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 22:11, 13 March 2014

Inscription
Transliteration: ?
Original script: ?

Object: BZ-10 slab (porphyry)
(Inscriptions: BZ-10.1, BZ-10.2)
Position: back, right-hand side"right-hand side" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property.
Script: unknown
Direction of writing: unknown
Craftsmanship: engraved
Current condition: damaged
Archaeological culture: Iron Age [from object]
Date of inscription: 5th–2nd centuries BC [from object]
Date derived from: archaeological context [from object]

Language: unknown
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: PID 196 b
IR 4 b
LIR BZ-13 b
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 181, 341 f.

Images

Commentary

First published in CII 24. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.

Pictures in Sulzer 1855: Tav. IX (drawing), Schneller 1866: Taf. II, Fig. 3, CII: tab. II (drawing = AIF I: Taf. II,36 A), Giovanelli 1876: Taf. II, No. 4, Oberziner 1883b: tab. XX and LIR (drawing).

Hardly readable due to weathering. Autopsy was impeded by the fact that the slab is currently on exhibition, fixedly attatched to the ground with its back to a wall. The shapes reproduced in older drawings could to some extent be ascertained, but the scratches are unequal – some deep and broad, some more fine and shallow and white in colour. Mancini did not include all the traces in his drawing. Though one may assume that the stone was in better condition when examined by the scholars of the 19th century, from a modern point of view it is doubtful whether we are concerned with the remains of an inscription, or merely damages.

Further references: Sulzer 1855: 307, Weber 1861: 36, Schneller 1866: 198 f., Giovanelli 1876: 97, Pichler 1880: 41 (no. 5), Oberziner 1883b: 150, AIF I 36, Battisti 1944: 227 f., Pisani 1953 321.

Bibliography

AIF I Carl Pauli, Altitalische Forschungen. Band 1: Die Inschriften nordetruskischen Alphabets, Leipzig: 1885.
Battisti 1944 Carlo Battisti, "Osservazioni sulla lingua delle iscrizioni nell'alfabeto etrusco settentrionale di Bolzano", Studi Etruschi 18 (1944), 199–236.
CII Ariodante Fabretti, Corpus inscriptionum italicarum, Torino: 1867. (2 volumes)
Giovanelli 1876 Benedetto Giovanelli, "Die Rhätisch-Etruskischen Alterthümer entdeckt bei Matrei im Mai 1845", Zeitschrift des Ferdinandeums für Tirol und Vorarlberg 3/20 (1876), 45–99.
IR Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306.
LIR Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes)
Marchesini 2014b Simona Marchesini, "Über die rätische Inschrift aus Pfatten/Vadena im Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Innsbruck", Wissenschaftliches Jahrbuch der Tiroler Landesmuseen 7 (2014), 202–217.