VN-16: Difference between revisions
Martin Braun (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|craftsmanship=engraved | |craftsmanship=engraved | ||
|condition=damaged | |condition=damaged | ||
|sigla_tm=653632 | |||
|checklevel=4 | |checklevel=4 | ||
|problem=grafik und belege in transpadanien für vierstrichiges H? interpretation: ekupetaris (vll. vorne länger?)? objektverlinkung, meaning of ?ari eintragen?, Position | |problem=grafik und belege in transpadanien für vierstrichiges H? interpretation: ekupetaris (vll. vorne länger?)? objektverlinkung, meaning of ?ari eintragen?, Position |
Latest revision as of 21:06, 8 November 2021
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ?aris |
Original script: | ? |
| |
Object: | VN-16 bone point (bone) |
Position: | |
Orientation: | 0° |
Script: | North Italic script |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Letter height: | 0.90.9 cm <br /> – 1.3 cm |
Number of letters: | 5 – 6 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | damaged |
Date of inscription: | last decade of the 2nd–1st centuries BC [from object] |
Date derived from: | archaeological context, natural science [from object] |
| |
Language: | Raetic |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | TM 653632 |
Images
Object VN-16 bone point with inscription VN-16.
|
Object VN-16 bone point with inscription VN-16.
|
Inscription VN-16 - front side.
|
Inscription VN-16 - rear side.
|
Commentary
Unpublished.
Inscribed on the tapered part of a bone point, running from the drilled hole towards the tip. Length 3 cm. The scratches appearing black on the light bone surface, legibility is impeded by black marks and blots, but is unambiguous. is a little shorter than the other letters, has a very short lower bar. In the right, more heavily scorched area, a group of scratches seems to make up a variant of Heta with four bars, which is not attested elsewhere in Raetic context. Cp. VN-8 with possibly a name in the genitive χaris (and a similar execution of ), but note that while the status of Heta/h in Raetic is not quite clear, Chi is assumed to write a velar media rather than a fricative, wherefore Heta would not be an expectable orthographic variant. Another possibile reading is etaris with one of Theta's lines rather straight.
On the reverse side, a neat sequence (height 1.2 cm, length 2.6 cm) must be interpreted as decoration.